Communicated: TefillaChillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.
Even as the so-called road map is now formally upon us, it is hardly necessary for The Jewish Press to once again go on record in opposition to the establishment of a Palestinian state. Our oft-stated, firm belief that the ultimate goal of the Palestinian national movement is the eradication of the Jewish state remains undiminished.
Moreover, there is, of course, our devotion to the biblical allocation of that part of the world to the Jewish people. Yet one also cannot ignore the existential reality that a prime minster of Israel must now confront - a world in which there is not a single country that would now stand
with Israel in opposition to a Palestinian state. Plainly, the inescapable task of an Israeli leader must be to ensure that the center of gravity of any accommodation between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs is as close to Israel’s core interests as is feasible. And it is in this light that we are encouraged by President Bush’s high profile, personal involvement in the road map.
Most of us were taken aback by Mr. Bush’s very public embrace of the road map and his going out of his way several times to place his prestige squarely behind it. This was especially so because those declarations invariably came in response to Israeli objections to several of the road map’s provisions.
As the message from the president of the United States seemed to be that Israel had better get on board, visions of Clintonian “pressure” leapt to the fore.
However, a sober review of some things that have happened since 9/11 provides a different perspective. If Operation Enduring Freedom in Afghanistan and Operation Iraqi Freedom demonstrated anything, it was that this president does not opt for face-saving ways out of problems, but is rather prepared to do what has to be done.
Equally as revealing was the President’s reaction to the Karine A affair. Mr. Bush had never trusted Yasir Arafat and made no bones about it. But it was when the seizure of the Karine A - with its clandestine cache of arms destined for Palestinian Arab terrorists - gave the lie to Arafat’s regular assurances of his peaceful intentions that the president decided to go public with his distaste for Arafat.
The decisive cutting-off of Arafat came when President Bush delivered his June 24, 2002 “regime change” speech calling for Arafat’s ouster: “I call upon the Palestinian people to elect new leaders, leaders not compromised by terror… Today, Palestinian authorities are encouraging, not opposing, terrorism. This is unacceptable.”
It may sound naive, but to us at least, Mr. Bush has proved, by word and by deed, that he is someone who will not be toyed with. We believe there is a clear message here for Abu Mazen and the “new” Palestinian leadership: If you are really serious about peace with Israel, I’ll know soon enough. If you choose to merely continue the Palestinan “rope a dope” tradition, I’ll know that too. And don’t count on me looking away or losing interest. There will be consequences.
To be sure, we are deeply concerned with, among others, some of the simultaneity provisions of the road map and, of course the inclusion of the “right of return” as an issue to be negotiated. But it should also be noted that the Israeli press on Tuesday reported comments of Prime Minister Sharon to the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee to the effect that there are side agreements and understandings with the Bush Administration on the
implementation of key provisions of the road map notwithstanding its formal terms.
We would also draw further attention to what President Bush had to say last June 24:
…[T]he United States will not support the establishment of a Palestinian state until its leaders
engage in a sustained fight against the terorrists and dismantle their infrastructure.. As we make progress towards security, Israeli forces need to withdraw fully to positions they held prior to September 28, 2000….As new Palestinians institutions and new leaders emerge, demonstrating real performance on security and reform, I expect israel to respond and work toward a final status agreement. With intensive effort by all, this agreement could be reached within three years from now. And I and my country will actively lead toward that goal.
Significantly, two days later, at a joint press conference with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, Mr. Bush responded to a question about how serious he was about his call for Palestinian “regime change” with,
I meant what I said, that there needs to be change. If people are interested in peace, something else has got to happen…. I also made it plenty clear that if their leadership is compromised by terror we won’t be on the path to peace. I’ve got confidence in the Palestinians that when they understand fully what we’re saying, they’ll make the right decisions as to how we get down the road to peace.”
Given the great anxiety about the road map, it would be wise to note that at that same press conference, referring to his June 24 speech the president said,
Obviously the road map I’ve laid out is one that calls upon all our friend and allies to join and bind together against terror; it calls upon the Arab nations to step up and firmly reject terror.” (Italics added.)
In sum, we are hopeful that despite our serious misgivings about the advent of the road map, it is still very much a work in progress.
About the Author:


You must log in to post a comment.


France 2 and Enderlin must have their press accreditation revoked and be thrown out of Israel.

Slaughter is a routine, widespread practice among many Moslem families.

parently an affront to J Street’s worldview, the focus of which appears to be the creation of a Palestinian State, whether or not that will bring peace.

The importance of the caucus on organ harvesting in China, sponsored recently by the Liberal Lobby in the Knesset, cannot be exaggerated.
My mother, the eldest daughter of Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt”l, was niftar last month at the age of 92. She took her last breath in her home in Efrat, Israel, next door to the shul that was my father’s for 24 years before his passing in 2007.
It comes down to his being famous.
Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.
It’s only natural to see increasing evidence of Jerusalem’s glorious Jewish past being unearthed, quite literally, under modern Israeli sovereignty. The new archaeological finds are also very timely – as the Arab onslaught attempting to detach Jerusalem from its Jewish roots gains steam, the facts on the ground, or “under” the ground, show quite otherwise.
The Talmud (Berachot 26b) says, “tefillot avot tiknum” – “prayer was established by the avot.” The Talmud then uses the following verse (Bereshit 19:27) to prove how Avraham established prayer: “Vayaskem Avraham baboker el hamakom asher amad sham et pnei Hashem” – “And Avraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood before God.”
Nearly 13 years ago, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak journeyed to Camp David to end the conflict with the Palestinians. With the approval of President Clinton, he offered Yasir Arafat an independent Palestinian state in almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and in part of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.
The news that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative groups has brought renewed spotlight on a 2010 lawsuit filed by the pro-Israel group Z Street, which alleges it was also singled out by the IRS when applying for tax-exempt status.
In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.
As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.
To his parents’ friends, he was “Mrs. Greenberg’s disgrace,” but to sports fans he is one of the greatest – if not the greatest – Jewish baseball players of all time. Long before Sandy Koufax, Hank Greenberg excited Jewish sports fans with his prowess on the baseball diamond.
In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.
As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.
Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.
We were dismayed by the announcement last week from Google that it was changing the name “Palestinian Territories” to “Palestine” across its products. In explaining the action, a Google spokesman said that “We consult a number of sources and authorities when naming countries…. In this case, we are following the lead of the UN, ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and other international organizations.”
It seems clear that there is a lot more to the current developments regarding Syria than Israel’s bombing some sites there, though staunching the flow of Iranian weapons to Hizbullah through Syria is plainly a significant objective.
Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent embrace of the Arab Peace Initiative is, to say the least, unnerving. Certainly the response of Arab leaders to his action reflects the dangers for Israel inherent in the plan. President Obama seems to be preoccupied these days with Syria and Iran as well as serious domestic issues and is largely leaving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Mr. Kerry. But the secretary of state seems poised to roil things up without any prospect of real progress.
Syria’s civil war is fast becoming one of the Obama administration’s greatest foreign policy challenges, for the moment even surpassing Iran’s march toward nuclear weaponry in its urgency. Together, both issues have effectively derailed the president’s long-range intention to focus on Asia and the emerging economic and military developments in China and other nations in the so-called Asian Pivot.
The investigation into the Boston bombings is still in its early stages but what seems to be emerging is that the presumed perpetrators were not directly linked to any foreign terrorist infrastructure. Rather, they were individual Americans radicalized by jihadist teachings and guided in their weapons-making by jihadist websites.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/abu-mazen-now-on-notice/2003/06/27/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online:
No related posts.