web analytics
April 2, 2015 / 13 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance

Posts Tagged ‘Palestinian State’

Bibi: ‘ISIS Would Devour Palestinian State, We Cannot Help Create That’

Monday, March 9th, 2015

Whether or not he was publicly forced into stating it, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has now said what most focused Israelis and Israel-watchers have realized for quite some time: the creation of any Palestinian State now, as weak as it is and has been since its leadership began attempting to resemble a functioning state, would be immediately subsumed (or, if you will, “gobbled up”) by ISIS or any of the other Islamic extremist groups in the region.

For that reason alone, if not for the myriad others – such as its own leadership’s inclination towards and support for its own version of terrorism – it is impossible for any responsible leader in the region to consider the creation of a Palestinian State any time soon.

In the words of the Israeli prime minister regarding the calamitous instability in the region and its impact on whether there should be a Palestinian state anytime soon: “Therefore, there will not be any withdrawals or concessions. The matter is simply irrelevant.”

Whether Netanyahu’s hand was forced because of the pressure placed on him by the Religious Zionist party Bayit Yehudi which consistently states it will not hand over any territory to the Arabs, or because a right-wing member of his own Likud party got the ball rolling, the end result is the same.

The cat is back in the bag, the Two State “Solution” is now clearly only a solution for ending Israel, and enslaving even the Palestinian Arabs themselves. For the safety of all those living in the land south of Lebanon, west of Syria and Jordan and north of Egypt, the only way to prevent ISIS and its fellow barbarous murderers is for Israel to remain in control of all the borders.

The Israeli prime minister began his most recent iteration in his leadership role with a earth-shattering speech at Bar Ilan University. Netanyahu invoked the “Two State” mantra as if it were within reach.

In that 2009 speech at Bar-Ilan, Netanyahu said he would recognize a Palestinian State “if we get a guarantee of demilitarization, and if the Palestinians recognize Israel as the Jewish state.” He said, if that were to happen, “we are ready to agree to a real peace agreement, a demilitarized Palestinian state side by side with the Jewish state.”

Even after the recent Gaza wars and bruising condemnations of Israeli self-defense by much of the international community, Netanyahu continued speaking, at least in public, of working with the Palestinian Arab leadership towards a result they claim (an idea that much of the international community was pushing very hard) they want: a Palestinian State.

Perhaps Netanyahu and his advisers believed that Israeli security is so strong it could even survive the birth of a tiny terror state of Palestine (Palistan?). But inviting ISIS into its own neural network? That would make the recent machete, hammer and automobile terrorism by local Palestinian Arab terrorists look like mere schoolyard spitting contests.

Netanyahu’s statement shutting the door on Palestinian statehood came on Sunday, March 8. It came in response to a question about a position taken by the Likud party’s answer to a small Israeli paper’s campaign question.

As Lahav Harkov reported in the Jerusalem Post on Sunday, “The article claimed that the Likud’s answer to a question as to its leader’s position on Palestinian statehood was: “The prime minister told the public that the Bar-Ilan speech [in which he advocated a demilitarized Palestinian state] is canceled.”

According to Harkov, a Likud spokesperson said party member MK Tzipi Hotovely provided the answer and it was her personal position. But regardless of whose language appeared in the campaign response, Netanyahu later made it clear he would not allow ISIS to fill the vacuum created by a weak Palestinian State.

Americans Split Over Palestinian Statehood, Gallup Poll Shows

Wednesday, February 25th, 2015

Americans are deeply conflicted over whether the United Nations should give birth to a new Arab country in the heart of Israel’s geographic borders, and call it “Palestine.”

The Gallup polling organization surveyed the U.S. population this month to determine how America feels about this issue. Pollsters conducted telephone interviews Feb. 8-11, 2015 with a random sample of 837 adults ages 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

(The margin of sampling error was plus-minus four percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level.)

The organization uncovered a conflict that splits the country almost right down the middle.

A majority of Americans still does not support the idea, however, even though they elected to vote passively: only 42 percent of those polled favored the establishment of an independent Palestinian state comprised of Judea, Samaria and Gaza, a drop from the 46 percent of one year ago, and a full 20 percent would not express an opinion at all.

Just 38 percent were opposed to the idea, however. The numbers grow higher the older the sample.

Older Americans aged 55 and up were opposed (43 percent) to the creation of an independent Palestinian state. Those younger (41 percent) were in favor – and 16 percent had no opinion.

Those with higher levels of education were more likely to favor PA statehood; however, 48 percent of Republicans opposed it, and just 33 percent of GOP members supported it. In the Democratic Party the majority supported PA statehood.

That last point in particular may have some bearing when it comes to U.S. national elections in 2016, and the run for the White House.

Arab-Israelis: Would You Move to a Palestinian State?

Sunday, January 25th, 2015

Corey Gil-Shuster always has an interesting question to ask.

Recently he asked Israeli-Arabs (and one leftwing Jewish Israeli professor) if they would want to move to a Palestinian State if it were created, and then when many of them said no or required more clarification about the question, he asked if they would want to be citizens of a Palestinian state if it meant they didn’t have to move.

Not surprisingly, the rambling leftwing Israeli activist/professor said she would move to a Palestinian state. She was also one of the most determined to do so.

Almost every other Arab he asked said no – and even the ones that said yes in the beginning, by the end of their answer, they either strongly qualified their statements or simply changed their answer. Some added that Palestine will replace Israel, so they wouldn’t have to move at all.

JCPA Poll: Solid Majority of Israeli Jews Oppose Palestinian State

Sunday, October 19th, 2014

A Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA) poll of Israeli Jews conducted between October 12-14, 2014 of 505 adult Israeli Jews showed that the majority oppose a Palestinian State when it is clearly defined for them what establishing a Palestinian state might entail, such as the division of Jerusalem or withdrawal from the Jordan Valley.

How do you identify yourself:

Right 60.2
Center 24.8
Left 13.5
1. In light of the spread of the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq, has this affected your stance regarding Israeli territorial concessions in the West Bank?

More ready for concessions 4.8%
Less ready for concessions 16.8%
No change 70.1%
Don’t know/no answer 8.3%
2. Do you support or oppose the establishment of a Palestinian state on the 1967 lines?

Support 18.2%
Oppose 74.3%
Don’t know/no answer 7.5%
3. Do you support or oppose the establishment of a Palestinian state if it means an Israeli withdrawal from the Jordan Valley?

Support 11.5%
Oppose 74.9%
Don’t know/no answer 13.7%
4. Would you agree to the replacement of the IDF with international forces in the Jordan Valley?

Agree 16.6%
Disagree 75.4%
Don’t know/no answer 7.9%
5. Do you support or oppose the establishment of a Palestinian state if it means the division of Jerusalem?

Support 16.2%
Oppose 76.2%
Don’t know/no answer 7.5%

British Parliament Backs Palestinian State in Vote

Tuesday, October 14th, 2014

The British House of Commons passed a symbolic resolution backing creation of a Palestinian state and of a two state partiton solution on Monday.

The exact wording of the resolution was:

“That this House believes that the Government should recognise the state of Palestine alongside the state of Israel as a contribution to securing a negotiated two state solution.”

While the vote initiated by the parliament’s opposition party won with 274 to 12, only half the members of the British Parliament actually voted.

It is not yet clear if this has any implications other than acknowledging that a “Palestinian state” does not exist, and that the UK is way behind the curve if they still support a “two state solution”.

If the resolution had actually recognized a Palestinian state, as some mistakenly believe, then that would mean a two-state solution has already been implemented.

The British government is not bound to do anything as a result of the vote.

The only question left is this, will UK lawmakers back Islamic State next?

PA Accuses Israel of ‘Blackmail,’ Threatens Return to UN

Tuesday, April 1st, 2014

The Palestinian Authority is accusing Israel of “blackmail” and instead says it is heading back to the United Nations to appeal for recognition as a sovereign nation if U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry can’t force Israel to release 30 terrorists.

The group comprises the final of four tranches to have been released last Friday from Israeli jails. Included were at least 20 Israeli Arab citizens, a controversial list opposed by nearly all of the ministers in Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s coalition government, especially in view of the fact that all of the major concessions since the talks began — as before — seem to have been made by Israel only.

Incensed PA officials rejected the alternate proposal advanced instead of the release last Friday by Israel’s government. Israel allegedly offered to released hundreds more terrorist prisoners if the PA continue final status negotiations beyond the April 29 deadline – but this time take the talks more seriously.

The response of Israel’s “peace partners” was not encouraging.

“Israel is practicing a policy of blackmail and linking its agreement to releasing the fourth tranche of prisoners with the Palestinians accepting an extension of the negotiations,” a PA official told news agencies in Ramallah.

“If Kerry doesn’t provide a clear answer on the release of the 30 prisoners [we] will initiate steps for acceptance to United Nations organizations,” Mustafa Barghouti, an independent PA parliament member, told news agencies Monday night.

The move would be a clear violation of all agreements the PA has made with Israel and the United States.

Since July 2013, Israel has freed 78 PA Arab terrorists and made numerous other concessions that endanger the security of its citizens in “good will gestures” to encourage the PA to remain at the negotiating table.

But the four-stage release of terrorists incarcerated in Israeli jails was conditioned upon the active participation in direct talks by PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas — and the Arab leader has not made good on his end of the deal.

It’s an old pattern, this “let’s talk some more about it but I can’t sit down with you until you give me what I want” — a game as beloved, familiar and ingrained in the Middle East as that being played out with Washington by the Iranians in Tehran.

Youngsters and tourists quickly learn the drill in the storefront alleyways of Jerusalem’s Old City market. And it’s profitable and even fun, until it turns deadly.

Survival makes it essential to learn to tell when the game is deadly, and when you can’t, it is equally important to have enough sense to trust your friends to tell you when it is.

Haaretz Calls Idea of Jewish State ‘Obsession’

Sunday, January 19th, 2014

Gideon Levy is the angry leftist of Haaretz, meaning he’s pushing the envelope leftward in a newspaper that’s already kind of over the precipice. And Gideon Levy has an agenda which he pushes relentlessly, to vilify Israelis who live in Judea and Samaria and to usher in a Palestinian State, God forbid.

The Israeli left has had a relatively easy time vilifying settlements. In Israel’s leftist vernacular, the settlers have a similar status to that of American welfare mothers in Republican politics: it’s all their fault. Every morsel of food given to the settlers is stolen directly from the mouths of babes in Sderot. Every road paved, every electric line added to Judea and Samaria communities are booty from the poor neighborhoods of south Tel Aviv.

In Israel’s leftist culture those are axioms that no longer require proof, such as the fact that the settlers pay a higher per capita tax rate, and put in many more reserve duty days than Israelis in “Israel proper.” And so, the issue of “thinning out” the settlements, or deporting all of them, has been received with less resistance than one might imagine, and it’s still being pushed by the media, day in and day out.

The part of the anticipated peace deal that’s been less easy to market to Israelis, even if they live in Ramat Aviv, the Labor-enclave in affluent north Tel Aviv, is the demand that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state.

Gideon Levy on Sunday set out to mock this sentiment, calling it an obsession. He writes that Israel’s inane demand to be recognized as Jewish reminds him of a neighbor he had as a child, a Holocaust survivor, who was obsessed with making sure her front door was locked when she left the house.

Levy compares that lady’s obsession with Israel’s insistence on the Jewish identity thing, concluding that both are equally sick. Israel, he argues, is basing its entire political process on this obsessive need to be Jewish, be it the peace deal, the treatment of illegal African migrants, the drive to change the demographic imbalance in the Galilee region.

In a world in which there are no more ethnically pure countries, Levy argues, Israel stands out with its wish to maintain its Jewish supremacy. Even, he says, at the cost of remaining a democracy.

Does the notion of Israel remaining a Jewish State offend you? Probably not, seeing as you’re reading a strongly pro-Zionist website. Having been born and grown up in this Jewish State, I suppose asking this question would be like asking a fish if he’s troubled by living in water. It’s a fact of life.

But I can certainly understand and support the demand on the part of Israel’s peace negotiators (while not wishing them any success at all, God willing) that a new Palestinian State officially recognize and uphold the Jewish character of Israel.

So far, the best we got out of the Arabs on that count has been to recognize that Israel is a cancer in the body of the great Arab nation. The Arab view of history and geography, since the year 699, when Mohammed’s hordes began to fill up the vacuum left behind by the Roman Empire, has been that the world is comprised of two parts: the part conquered by Islam and the part yet to be conquered by Islam.

I don’t wish to go into whether this conquest is through warlike or peaceful means, the view is the same if you’re an Al Qaeda terrorist or a peaceful moderate, and I don’t begrudge them their point of view.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/haaretz-calls-idea-of-jewish-state-obsession/2014/01/19/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: