web analytics
November 28, 2014 / 6 Kislev, 5775
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post
IDC Herzliya Campus A Day on Campus

To mark IDC Herzliya’s 20th anniversary, we spent a day following Prof. Uriel Reichman, IDC’s founder and president, and Jonathan Davis, VP for External Relations, around its delightful campus.



‘You Murder the Children’: Rav Soloveitchik on Abortion

Rav Soloveitchik stated that "to me it is something vulgar, this clamor of the liberals that abortion be permitted."
Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik

Rabbi Joseph B. Soloveitchik
Photo Credit: Rabbi Irwin Albert

When one thinks of Modern Orthodoxy, Rav Joseph B. Soloveitchik zt”l soon comes to mind for his leadership thereof. In our time, however, Modern Orthodoxy has become a vague term with problematic tendencies. As Rabbi Steven Pruzansky–who has numerous shiurim on Yeshiva University’s Torah website–recently wrote, “Too often, one finds in the Modern Orthodox world grievances of one sort or another against this or that aspect of Torah, as if Jews get to sit in judgment of God and His Torah.”

No issue might better crystallize the dissonance between Rav Soloveitchik’s Modern Orthodoxy and today’s than abortion. Let us consider the great man’s views.

During a shiur on Parashat Bo in 1975, Rav Soloveitchik stated that “to me it is something vulgar, this clamor of the liberals that abortion be permitted,” adding:

“I consider the society of today as insane…I read from the press that in Eretz Yisrael they permit abortions now! Sapir [probably Pinchas Sapir] comes to the US and asks that 60,000 boys and girls should leave the US and settle in Eretz Yisrael. When a child is born, it’s also immigration to Eretz Yisrael, and yet you murder the children.”

Rav Soloveitchik then predicted:

“And if you kill the fetus, a time will come when even infants will be killed…The mother will get frightened after the baby will be born…and the doctor will say her life depends upon the murder of the baby. And you have a word, mental hygiene, whatever you want you can subsume under mental hygiene…And there is now a tendency for rabbis in the US to march along with society, otherwise they’ll be looked upon as reactionaries.”

Similar remarks appear in Reflections of the Rav:

“If the dominant principle governing the logos ["thinking capacity"] is that abortion is morally permissible because only a mother has a right to decide whether she wishes to be a mother, then infants may similarly have their lives terminated after birth. What if the child interferes with the promising brilliant career of the mother?”

These words might be jarring for those who view Rav Soloveitchik as the mild-mannered author of philosophically oriented books like The Lonely Man of Faith. Equally if not more jarring might be Rav Soloveitchik’s statements on sexual morality, which I discussed a few months ago.

Specific to abortion, one might counter that Rav Soloveitchik permitted an unborn child with Tay-Sachs disease to be aborted through the sixth month, but this proves just the opposite, namely: 1) What does this narrow, tragic case indicate about Rav Soloveitchik’s general view of abortion? 2) What does it indicate about Rav Soloveitchik’s view of abortion after the sixth month even in the case of Tay-Sachs? And vis-à-vis those who claim a woman’s absolute right to “terminate a pregnancy” at any point, I doubt such an attempt to (mis)represent Rav Soloveitchik as a “moderate” on abortion would be received agreeably. In this regard, one of Rav Soloveitchik’s sons-in-law, Rav Aharon Lichtenstein, shlita, has observed in the context of abortion:

“Even if we were to accept that indeed it is the woman’s own body, we totally reject the conception that she then can do with it as she pleases. This is a completely anti-halakhic perception [emphasis added]. It rests on a secular assumption that, as it were, ‘My Nile is my own; I made it for myself’ (Yechezkel 29:3), as if we are the source of our own existence and therefore the masters of our own being. This is assuredly not the case.”

Rav Lichtenstein summarizes the worldview of that anti-halakhic perception as follows:

“The essence of modern secular culture is the notion of human sovereignty; individual man is master over himself, and collective man is master over his collective… From a religious point of view, of course, eilu va-eilu divrei avoda zara—both approaches are idolatrous. Here one establishes individual man as an idol, and the one idolizes, in humanistic terms, humanity as a whole. The basis of any religious perception of human existence is the sense that man is not a master: neither a master over the world around him, nor a master over himself.”

Yes, Rav Soloveitchik earned a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Berlin (as likewise Rav Lichtenstein earned a Ph.D. in English literature from Harvard). Yes, Rav Soloveitchik enjoyed classical music (especially Bach). And first and foremost, Rav Soloveitchik was a Torah Jew for whom Halachah was not some intellectual game or cultural style, rather an all-encompassing conviction with profound social implications. Thus his denunciations of abortion, which derived from the same worldview as these remarks in 1953:

About the Author: Menachem Ben-Mordechai has written for numerous publications on subjects ranging from Israel and Latin America to the sport of powerlifting and life insurance. He has also coached elite powerlifters as well as beginners. Menachem's other writing can be found under the name Myles Kantor.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

17 Responses to “‘You Murder the Children’: Rav Soloveitchik on Abortion”

  1. Jennifer Waybright says:

    bingo!

  2. I guess he disagrees with the Torah and the Halacha, which give the choice to a woman to proceed -or not- with the pregnancy based on her ability to care for herself (and the children she may already have).

  3. I guess he disagrees with the Torah and the Halacha, which give the choice to a woman to proceed -or not- with the pregnancy based on her ability to care for herself (and the children she may already have).

  4. Myriam Obadia says:

    I guess he disagrees with the Torah and the Halacha, which give the choice to a woman to proceed -or not- with the pregnancy based on her ability to care for herself (and the children she may already have).

  5. Myriam Obadia says:

    I guess he disagrees with the Torah and Halacha which give a woman the right to choose whether or not to proceed with the pregnancy, based on her ability to provide for a child without harming herself (or shortchanging the children she may already have). As an Orthodox Jew, he should accept the fact that Hashem gave men the duty to make children, while he gave the choice to do so to women.

  6. I guess he disagrees that the Torah actually says that. I would tend to rely on his scholarship and piety. Not yours.

  7. I guess he disagrees that the Torah actually says that. I would tend to rely on his scholarship and piety. Not yours.

  8. "Rav Soloveitchik permitted an unborn child with Tay-Sachs disease to be aborted through the sixth month," Therein lies the weakness. He permitted it until the sixth month, in the case of Tay-Sachs. Why not only until the fifth or the second, or why not up to the eighth or ninth? Why just Tay-Sachs? Is it because of personal revulsion, or a view to the "beginning of human life", or the hardships ot child or parent or both, if the child were to be let live? But what does that say about other "undesireable" conditions, other "undesirable" people – such as the senile elderly, the burdonsome, etc. ? Much better to not make the exception that the Rav makes.

  9. "Rav Soloveitchik permitted an unborn child with Tay-Sachs disease to be aborted through the sixth month," Therein lies the weakness. He permitted it until the sixth month, in the case of Tay-Sachs. Why not only until the fifth or the second, or why not up to the eighth or ninth? Why just Tay-Sachs? Is it because of personal revulsion, or a view to the "beginning of human life", or the hardships ot child or parent or both, if the child were to be let live? But what does that say about other "undesireable" conditions, other "undesirable" people – such as the senile elderly, the burdonsome, etc. ? Much better to not make the exception that the Rav makes.

  10. Myriam Obadia says:

    Michael Mostofsky you rely on whomever you wish. I am just stating a fact: the Halacha allows abortion in case the pregnancy is deleterious to the mother's health or the welfare of her other children. Baruch Hashem, I never had to make such a dreadful choice, but Hashem did give that right to me in case I needed it.

  11. Bert Schlossberg says:

    "the Halacha allows abortion in case the pregnancy is deleterious to the mother's health or the welfare of her other children". In the case that pregnancy causes a weakness or backpains to the mother or some other deleterious condition, does Halacha allow an abortion? If the money for school supplies has now to be streched, at the birth of a baby, to cover four living children instead five living children in a poor family, does that halacha allow the abortion of that fifith?

  12. Bert Schlossberg says:

    "the Halacha allows abortion in case the pregnancy is deleterious to the mother's health or the welfare of her other children". In the case that pregnancy causes a weakness or backpains to the mother or some other deleterious condition, does Halacha allow an abortion? If the money for school supplies has now to be streched, at the birth of a baby, to cover four living children instead five living children in a poor family, does that halacha allow the abortion of that fifith?

  13. Myriam Obadia says:

    It allows it in case the detriments are serious enough. I doubt very much back pain qualifies, but should the mother need to choose between not getting a cancer treated and aborting in order to receive prompt treatment, I do think the Halacha allows her to abort the fetus. The case of welfare of the other children is actually specifically mentioned by the rabbanim: a breast feeding mother who becomes pregnant is allowed to abort the new fetus, so that the baby she already has isn't deprived of his need of both the milk and the constant care of his/her mother. The Torah and Halacha always give priority to the person already alive over the potential life of a fetus.

  14. Myriam Obadia says:

    It allows it in case the detriments are serious enough. I doubt very much back pain qualifies, but should the mother need to choose between not getting a cancer treated and aborting in order to receive prompt treatment, I do think the Halacha allows her to abort the fetus. The case of welfare of the other children is actually specifically mentioned by the rabbanim: a breast feeding mother who becomes pregnant is allowed to abort the new fetus, so that the baby she already has isn't deprived of his need of both the milk and the constant care of his/her mother. The Torah and Halacha always give priority to the person already alive over the potential life of a fetus.

  15. Ravcherri says:

    Excellent article and not what the MOs want to hear.

  16. Brian Kent says:

    Myriam Obadia "or the welfare of the other children".? I never heard of that heter. Can you kindly provide a source in which you say the rabbanim permit this?

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
IDF Chief Rabbi Rafi Peretz delivers lecture.
IDF Chief Rabbi: Nothing is Holy to Muslims on Temple Mount except Al Aqsa
Latest Blogs Stories
Worshipers were cut down as they prayed

It’s clear that Obama equates Israelis and Arabs as equal sufferers of “violence.”

Ferguson, Missouri: rioting against racism, encouraging murder

The malicious manipulation of frustrated fury is surely as egregious as merely perceived racism.

About 7 in 10 Americans view Israel favorably – making Israel the only positively viewed Middle East country. But the younger Americans get, the more they like some Arab countries.

Undoubtedly, once he’s “former president Obama” he’ll join anti-Israel Jimmy Carter against Israel.

train track grafitti

The silly people on the left have created a new campaign to try and force the rest of the country to capitulate to their suicidal fantasies, this time by riding trains and imposing themselves onto other people’s conferences.

Find out how to set goals and take better care of your finances.

As events over the last couple of weeks amply demonstrate, the status quo isn’t working out either

Australian Ambassador to Israel ran to the hospital in J’m to visit the wounded and to donate blood

Those celebrating violence with “No Justice No Peace” signs are opposed to both justice and peace.

Pop quiz: The shortest book ever written? “Palestinian History and Positive Contributions” text book

We are the continuing generations from our Father Avraham who was given this Land by our L-rd.

When a country supports ($) the PA or Gaza or “recognizes,” “Palestine,” they promoting terrorism.

There is no question whatsoever that Odeh was behind the fatal bombing of a SuperSol market in 1969

As we Jews returned to the Holy Land and prayed at our holy sites, forces fighting holiness came too

Channel 10 TV published on Sunday a poll they commissioned asking Israeli Arabs a rather straightforward but important question:

Today”s discussion: “The effects of current geopolitical situation around the world on investing.”

According to PM Netanyahu, the bill would enshrine full equality under law to all Israeli citizens.

More Articles from Menachem Ben-Mordechai
Rabbi Meir Kahane HY"D

He described Sharon as “the latest darling of the donkey-nationalists.”

MK Miri regev with flag

Regev is part of the reason why numerous Israelis have suffered so many aerial acts of attempted murder from that region.

There are many good, solid reasons to support applying the death penalty to a variety of crimes.

Rav Soloveitchik stated that “to me it is something vulgar, this clamor of the liberals that abortion be permitted.”

That there is even a debate in the religious sector about obeying eviction orders reflects a warping of core values.

When a Jew is shot to death in Eretz Yisrael and the murderer plea bargains to a twelve-year sentence, Israel’s banner is low.

The awful truth is that Israel invites foreign contempt because it shows contempt for itself.

“We believe that every person in Israel must have their fundamental rights met…” Not applicable to terror victims and their families’ fundamental right to justice.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/a-banner-raised-high/you-murder-the-children-rav-soloveitchik-on-abortion/2013/09/23/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: