web analytics
December 1, 2015 / 19 Kislev, 5776
At a Glance
Sponsored Post

Peter Beinart’s Cocoon

The restrictions Beinart condemns today came because of Palestinian terror, not the other way around.

In the New York Review of Books, Peter Beinart is upset that the organized American Jewish community doesn’t invite Palestinian Arabs to speak at their events. He believes that American Jews don’t give enough empathy to Palestinian Arabs.

For the most part, Palestinians do not speak in American synagogues or write in the Jewish press. The organization Birthright, which since 1999 has taken almost 350,000 young Diaspora Jews—mostly Americans—to visit Israel, does not venture to Palestinian towns and cities in the West Bank. Of the more than two hundred advertised speakers at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s (AIPAC) 2013 Policy Conference, two were Palestinians. By American Jewish standards, that’s high. The American Jewish Committee’s Global Forum earlier this year, which advertised sixty-four speakers, did not include a single Palestinian.

…Guidelines like Hillel’s—which codify the de facto restrictions that exist in many establishment American Jewish groups—make the organized American Jewish community a closed intellectual space, isolated from the experiences and perspectives of roughly half the people under Israeli control. And the result is that American Jewish leaders, even those who harbor no animosity toward Palestinians, know little about the reality of their lives.

Beinart grudgingly admits:

This lack of familiarity with Palestinian life also inclines many in the organized American Jewish world to assume that Palestinian anger toward Israel must be a product solely of Palestinian pathology. Rare is the American Jewish discussion of Israel that does not include some reference to the textbooks and television programs that “teach Palestinians to hate.” These charges have some merit. Palestinian schools and media do traffic in anti-Semitism and promote violence.


Still, what’s often glaringly absent from the American Jewish discussion of Palestinian hatred is any recognition that some of it might stem not from what Palestinians read or hear about the Jewish state, but from the way they interact with it in their daily lives.

Beinart is at least as guilty of willful blindness as the American Jewish establishment he is insulting. His “Open Zion” site all but ignores the Palestinian Arab hate and antisemitism, just as he attempts to minimize it and contextualize it here as a natural result of things Israelis did. He says that most terror attacks are the result of anger at Israeli actions from the first intifada, without mentioning who started the first intifada. No doubt Israel’s initial reaction was more severe than would be acceptable today, but at the time Palestinian Arabs from the West Bank and Gaza would travel freely to pre-1967 Israel and Israelis would visit freely to Arab areas, without fear.

The restrictions that Beinart is so upset about today came because of Palestinian Arab terror, not the other way around.

Moreover, while Beinart talks about checkpoints that exist today, what does he think would happen if a two-state solution that he so passionately supports would occur? They wouldn’t be checkpoints – there would be national borders. Try commuting to another country every day, let alone an enemy country, and see how painless it is.

American Jewish leaders have access to The New York Times, the BBC, the Guardian and, yes, Open Zion. Jewish Americans read Thomas Friedman and Roger Cohen. The idea that they somehow live in a pro-Likud bubble is ridiculous. They know far more about Palestinian Arab claims and grievances than readers of Open Zion know about the day to day incitement against Israel and Jews in Palestinian Arab lives – not just “textbooks and television programs” but virtually every newspaper, every school, every media.

This is the stuff I expose along with MEMRI, Palestinian Media Watch and others.

Beinart would like to pretend that we cherry pick the worst examples. To an extent that is true. That’s how the media works – to show the worst in order to illuminate the facts – something Beinart is doing in this very essay.

However, as someone who reads quite a bit of Arabic media daily, I can assure Beinart and my readers that the hate isn’t an anomaly, while people like Salam Fayyad are the silent majority. No – within the “cocoon” of Palestinian Arab life, there is zero tolerance for any viewpoint that is the least bit conciliatory to real coexistence and peace. The hate is pervasive, not anomalous. Anyone who would speak to an American Jewish organization would, by that very fact, lose all legitimacy from their own people.

About the Author: Elder blogs at http://elderofziyon.blogspot.co.il/

The author's opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Jewish Press.

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “Peter Beinart’s Cocoon”

  1. Tim Upham says:

    Sorry Elder of Ziyon, Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish has spoken at several synagogues in the United States. I question if Elder of Ziyon's hate is not pervasive. It sure sounds so to me. Now the are calling Peter Beinarts an "Anti-Semitic Muslim Nazi." They already called me one.

  2. and then there's the measured, inclusive, lovable comments of that paragon: Rabbi Ovadia YOSEF (of "blessed memory"…depending on whom you consider worthy oa being BLESSED!

  3. Robert Taylor Yiou are a pitiful charlatan Taylor, who peddles his vacuous, empty nonsense BS over at ToI. The same applies to addled-mind Upham. You are both syrupy soft-antisemites and idiots. Get lost u 2 old morons.

  4. Gabor? You survived the man-eating sturgeon in the Danube? Good to hear from you! (and thanks for the heartfelt comments!)…(all the best to you and yours!)

  5. Tim Upham says:

    Gabor Hungary What would Anti-Semites be reading "The Jewish Press" for? You should be on the website of the Jewish Defense League. Its president, Irv Rubin, committed suicide after it was uncovered that he wanted the league to kill Muslims living in the United States. They were also going to kill California Congressman, Darrell Issa, who is of Lebanese descent. Who would anyone want to kill Marlo Thomas? Do you think your insults towards us is going to stop the Jobbik Party?

  6. Ira Steinberg says:

    Did you actually read the article? He acknowledges the hatred and anti-semitism of Palestinian extremists and domestic activists. He just says that we can't use their hatred as an excuse for lazy thinking and a failure to understand their perspective and the reality of life on both sides of the green line. It's almost as if your response proves his point about the epistemic closure in the Jewish community.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Photo of an oil refinery in Homs, Syria, snapped in 2010, long before the Da'esh (ISIS) terror organization seized control over the area.
Erdogan to Quit If Putin Proves Claim Turkey Imports Oil From ISIS

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/elder-of-ziyon/peter-beinarts-cocoon/2013/09/03/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: