web analytics
May 7, 2015 / 18 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post


Who Killed the Peace Process?

The diplomatic "peace process," worthless though it may have been, died on November 29, 2012 at the hands of Mahmoud Abbas.
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at a rally supporting the Palestinian UN bid for observer state status, in Ramallah, Nov. 25, 2012.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at a rally supporting the Palestinian UN bid for observer state status, in Ramallah, Nov. 25, 2012.
Photo Credit: Issam Rimawi/FLASH90

The so-called ‘peace process’ was based on UN Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, and the most serious attempt to implement them on the ground was the Oslo Accords, agreements signed in 1993-95.

Although both sides complained about violations of the Oslo Accords — Israel complained about continued incitement and terrorism, which increased sharply after Arafat’s return from exile in Tunis, and the Palestinians complained that Israel was not withdrawing fast enough — the final nail of Oslo’s coffin was hammered in by Mahmoud Abbas, when he asked the UN to declare ‘Palestine’ a state.

Art. XXXI.7 of the 1995 Interim Agreement says “Neither side shall initiate or take any step that will change the status of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip pending the outcome of the permanent status negotiations”). This is exactly what Abbas did, and he can’t blame it on unaccountable terrorist factions, as Arafat liked to do after his assassins murdered Jews.

Israelis always understood Oslo as a compromise — that neither side would get everything that it wanted. But the PLO always saw it as a surrender agreement, and became ‘frustrated’ (and everyone knows how Palestinians behave when that happens) when Israel didn’t simply withdraw from all of the territories in return for nothing.

The father of all peace processes was UN Security Council Resolution 242, which called for  Israel to withdraw from territories conquered in 1967, and for

Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.

Land for peace and secure borders. At first the Arabs wouldn’t even consider an agreement that promised peace (see the “Three No’s“). But more recently, they proposed the “Arab Initiative,” which calls for complete Israeli withdrawal, assumption of guilt, and right of return for Arab refugees (what a deal!).

The decision of the UN General Assembly to grant Palestine non-member state status in all of the territories conquered in 1967 directly contradicts resolution 242 because it gives all of the territories to Palestine, without guaranteeing Israel secure boundaries or peace.

If we go back farther, the GA has also taken back the promise to the Jewish people made by its predecessor, the League of Nations, and embodied in the Palestine Mandate, to encourage “close settlement on the land” by Jews in their historic homeland.

It is interesting that although Israel has made great concessions since 1967 — withdrawing from the Sinai, withdrawing from Gaza, legitimizing the PLO, etc. — the Arab side has taken precisely one step since the Three No’s: it has agreed to talk, and this only because its military initiatives consistently failed.

Of course, General Assembly resolutions are nonbinding, and this one does not have consequences on the ground.

Which brings us to E1. Israel has announced plans to build housing in the area called E1, which is located between eastern Jerusalem and the settlement of Ma’ale Adumim, 4 miles away. This has stirred up a hornet’s nest in the anti-Israel camp. The NY Times (which accurately reflects the position of the Obama Administration) wrote in an editorialthat this

could doom the chances for a two-state solution because building in the E1 area would split the northern and southern parts of the West Bank.

Apparently the Times editorial board does not possess a map of the region or the ability to read one. I can help:

Ma’ale Adumim is one of those communities that were expected to become part of Israel in any negotiated settlement. Not only does it not cut the “West Bank” in half as the Times asserts, but the distance between the eastern part of Ma’ale Adumim and the Jordan is greater than the width of Israel at its narrowest point according to the pre-1967 borders!

So who doomed the “two-state solution?” If you mean a compromise solution in which neither side gets everything it wants, but in which both sides can have peace and security, as envisioned in UNSC 242, then it never had a chance, because this is not what the Arabs mean by the expression. The diplomatic ‘peace process’, worthless though it may have been, died on November 29, 2012 at the hands of Mahmoud Abbas.

About the Author: Vic Rosenthal created FresnoZionism.org to provide a forum for publishing and discussing issues about Israel and the Mideast conflict, especially where there is a local connection. Rosenthal believes that America’s interests are best served by supporting the democratic state of Israel, the front line in the struggle between Western civilization and radical Islam. The viewpoint is not intended to be liberal or conservative — just pro-Israel.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

2 Responses to “Who Killed the Peace Process?”

  1. Rc Fowler says:

    There never was a peace process–the only process which was and still is–is the process of destroying Israel!

  2. Gil Gilman says:

    In order to answer the question posed by the title of this article, one must suppose a peace process was ever in existence. A process is that which leads to a verifiable result. In this case there never was nor wiil there ever be peace resulting from the process currently employed. In any experiment, the parameters and ingredients must be controlled, and the absence of interfering radicals, elements, and catalytic agents cannot be assumed, but eliminated.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Iran says Maersk ship to be freed in two days.
Iran Says Maersk Ship to Be Released This Week
Latest Blogs Stories
BB

Bibi first gets the most difficult potential partners to sign, only then he signs his natural allies

Israeli PM Binyamin Netanyahu speaking to Conference of Major American Jewish Organizations.

You’d think Bibi’d be better at coalition building but he isn’t. The incoming government’s a new low

In fact, Hill buckled to BDS pressure and will NOT be performing.

Hill’s Israel concert was selling tickets for months. Had she even planned a concert in Ramallah?

Israeli Flag  Flies at Nepal IDF Field Hospital

If you leave it to the world news, you’d never know the numerous miracles Israel’s doing in Nepal…

There are encouraging reports of increased enrollment in Charedi army and educational programs

Learn why time management is important & how it can help build your business, from Jan Lukacs & Doug

The problem isn’t police violence against Ethiopians. The problem is police violence.

Gazan terrorists use cement that Israel sent to build schools&hospitals for a complex tunnel network

What do we want from government? True leadership that realizes placating others is not the solution.

Rav Riskin’s desire to strengthen ties with Christians is pure but his methods have crossed lines

A minute and a half? What if the kids are upstairs with earphones on and they don’t hear the siren?

My gut says it’s the New Israel Fund behind the violent demonstrations by Ethiopian Jews in Israel

Discover the meaning of financial freedom and if you’ll achieve the standard of living that you want

Today’s world and a shocking amount of Jews and Israelis support apartheid against Jews in of Israel

Let’s revel in Peter Beinart’s unintended “Ma Tovu” praise of the Jewish state: “It’s modern; it’s democratic; it’s pro-American.”

Point is, the eyes are the soul’s windows and forbidden images, face it or not, pollute a Jew’s soul

More Articles from Vic Rosenthal
housefly-155460_1280

Oh, to be a fly-on-the-wall in the White House…

SynagogueMurders

No more ‘peace process’ envisioning sovereign ‘Palestine’ in YESHA; Arabs can call today “Nakba 2.0″

The extreme hypocrisy, contempt & vulgarity of the attacks indicate more than a policy disagreement

Expecting the IDF to mount a ground attack against Hamas in Gaza? There may be a better approach…

It looks from here like a really bad weekend in Israel. Some 40-odd rockets were fired from Gaza at southern Israel within 48 hours, as far as Beersheva. Arabs rioted throughout the country, throwing rocks and firebombs at any available Jewish target. They systematically destroyed the light rail tracks, stations and equipment in Arab neighborhoods […]

The problem is a culture whose essence is to negate ours.

The teenagers in the video, then, were either injured non-seriously by rubber bullets, or faking for the camera.

The liberal wing of the Jewish establishment in the US is following the same path as it did in the 1940s.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/fresno-zionism/who-killed-the-peace-process/2012/12/05/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: