web analytics
March 27, 2015 / 7 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post


BIG LIE EXPOSED

Letter Reveals Rav Ovadia Retracted ‘Land for Peace’ Ruling in 2003

Another Big Lie is exposed. Rav Ovadia favored giving up land for peace in 1993. But when the PA blew up the Oslo Accords 10 years later, the rabbi ruled, “Oslo is null and void. This is not the peace I meant.”

Israeli bus after suicide bombing.

Israeli bus after suicide bombing.
Photo Credit: Flash90

However, 97 percent of the land of Judea, Gaza and Samaria was not enough for the Palestinian Authority, and he launched the Oslo War that clearly made Rav Ovadia’s ruling irrelevant to the new reality of “land for terror.”

Rav Ovadia's letter in 2003 in which he reversed his "land for peace" ruling and said that is is forbidden because it endangers Jews..

Rav Ovadia’s letter in 2003 in which he reversed his “land for peace” ruling and said that is is forbidden because it endangers Jews..

About the Author: Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu is a graduate in journalism and economics from The George Washington University. He has worked as a cub reporter in rural Virginia and as senior copy editor for major Canadian metropolitan dailies. Tzvi wrote for Arutz Sheva for several years before joining the Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

13 Responses to “Letter Reveals Rav Ovadia Retracted ‘Land for Peace’ Ruling in 2003”

  1. Daas Torah says:

    Rabbi Ovadia wrote in his book, “Yabia Omer,” that saving lives is more important than territorial claims.

    http://1daastorah.blogspot.com/2013/10/bdh-rabbi-ovadia-yosef-ztl.html#more

  2. Daas Torah says:

    Rabbi Ovadia wrote in his book, “Yabia Omer,” that saving lives is more important than territorial claims.

    http://1daastorah.blogspot.com/2013/10/bdh-rabbi-ovadia-yosef-ztl.html#more

  3. Vogelgesang Sylvie says:

    this is important information for the temporal , vital information for eternity is found in Daniel 9 , it is there one find the precise timing of the coming of Messiah ?

  4. it is not only the left wing who are angry about rav ovadia and oslo. also all the victims of oslo and do not tell me a rabbi who knows torah, does not know the verses that say you cannot make peace with the wicked. no he was wrong and people died. why should we rejoice because he said whoops mistake years later. the dead are still dead.

  5. This article is misleading. Rav Ovadia z"l ruled that, theoretically, it would be permissible to give up land to achieve peace if the military and political leadership truly believed that a peace agreement would enhance the security of the state and save lives in both the immediate and long term. He did not rule that the government must at that time sign the Oslo accords. His later statements indicate that he did not believe that the P.A. could be trusted and that he believed that the P.A. were enemies of the Jewish People and needed to be fought as an enemy. That does not contradict his original ruling that, in theory, land can be given up for peace. His original ruling was to counter a prevailing opinion in the National Religious camp that it is sinful to give up land under any circumstances and that it was ontologically impossible to achieve piece by giving up land. I believe that this article is both incorrect and irresponsible. It is not, in fact, "eye opening" at all.

  6. Yechiel Baum says:

    The land of Israel was NOT Rav Ovadya's to give up to begin with.
    Did he stand higher than Hashem who decreed that all of the land of Israel belongs to the Jews and to no one else.

  7. Rav Ovadia z"l did not believe ch"v that he "stood higher than G-d." He believed that the halakha in our times does not prohibit forfeiting land for the sake of piece and he believed that this was what the Torah actually sanctioned. The fact that the prophets promise that ultimately there will be a return of the shvatim and the land will all be in our control does not, in the opinion of Rav Ovadia, mean that we are prohibited from surrendering land if we believe that a peace agreement will increase the security of the state. Later, Rav Ovadia expressed the opinion that peace with the Palestinians was not presently possible, but that does not mean he retracted his halakhic ruling. His halakhic ruling was not applicable to a situation where we believe that a territorial compromise would decrease security and lead to greater loss of life. His ruling applied only to situations where one believes that a territorial compromise would lead to increased security and would save lives. Whether a peace plan will work is a political question and not a halakhic question. Whether, in theory, one can give up land in certain scenarios is a halakhic question. One needs to separate halakhic rulings form political opinions. I believe if you would read his teshuva on this you would not ask such questions. Again this news article is entirely misleading and you appear to be among those misled by it.

  8. What a load of crap this article is. We judge a man by his actions not his words, and Ovadia Kesef was ready to support Oslo up to the day he died. In fact, he was ready to support the "Peace" process even after the most recent elections a couple of months ago, in return for Sha$ being in the government. In the end, Sha$ didn't make it into the government, not because of anything having to do with the "Peace" process, but because Yair Lapid of the Yesh Atid party declared that he would not sit in the same government as any Haredi party, so Bibi chose Lapid over the Haredi parties. This is the same reason that Degel HaTorah is not in the government this time either.

  9. What a load of crap this article is. We judge a man by his actions, not his words, and Ovadia Kesef was ready to support Oslo up to the day he died. In fact, he was ready to support the "Peace" process even after the most recent elections a couple of months ago, in return for Sha$ being in the government. In the end, Sha$ didn't make it into the government, not because of anything having to do with the "Peace" process, but because Yair Lapid of the Yesh Atid party declared that he would not sit in the same government as any Haredi party, so Bibi chose Lapid over the Haredi parties. This is the same reason that Degel HaTorah is not in the government this time either.

  10. Zvi Zimri says:

    Christians, [lease go away. This has no relation to your supposed messiah, the J-idol on the stick.

  11. Zvi Zimri says:

    Christians, please go away. This has no relation to your supposed messiah, the J-idol on the stick.

  12. I have always been against the concept of land for peace. One of the reasons is Israel is a tiny country who has already given up land that was rightfully theirs religiously, politically, and morally. The other reason is, it simply does not work. Land for peace has never achieved peace, all it does is embolden the enemy to become even more violent and less rational. Land for peace is a form of appeasement and as history has shown on multiple occasions, appeasement fails miserably. This is the reason why I am also against other forms of appeasement like releasing Palestinian terrorists from prison, what did it achieve in the latest round of “peace talks.” Is Israel any closer to peace with the Palestinians now than they were before they released the terrorists from prison? Have the Palestinians reciprocated by making any concessions of their own? If anything, things have gotten worse because of increased violence against innocent Israelis. The same holds true with settlement freezes. It has become a popular cliché for the international community to claim that settlements are the obstacle to peace. If this is the case, why has there been no peace when Israel stopped settlement building in the past? The obstacle to peace has been the unwillingness of the Arabs to live as responsible, normal neighbors with Israel and no amount of appeasement will change this fact.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Palestinian Authority TV broadcasts incitement from children's school theater.
Palestinian Authority School Children: Boycott Israel by Killing Jews [video]
Latest News Stories
Rice

Kosher for Passover? Depends who you ask.

Druze from the Golan Heights gather in the village of Majdal Shams requesting that the area to revert to being under the authority of the Syrian government.

The main suspect confessed to passing on information to Syria through the Internet.

Palestinian Authority TV broadcasts incitement from children's school theater.

Has anyone asked Obama why Netanyahu should even think about agreeing to a Palestinian Authority country?

A U.S. Air Force F-15 warplane dropped approximately 60,000 leaflets over the Syrian city of Raqaa to discourage people from joining the Islamic State (ISIS), the Pentagon revealed Thursday. The “Military Information Support Operations,” propaganda campaign was carried out last week and was the first time the United States has used the tactic in Syria. […]

Israel reportedly wants to change the names to Hebrew, which would affront Muslim sensitivities.

The non-binding vote approves funds for imposing sanctions if Iran violates a deal.

Congress is ‘fed up’ with being left in the dark on the Iran negotiations

While there’s not much snow left, there are bike trails, hiking trails and extreme mountain sleds.

The White House says another foreign policy failure proves Obama is doing something right, but it not clear exactly what.

Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas said Thursday he supports Saudi Arabia’s attack on Iranian-backed Huthi rebels in Yemen Saudi Arabia has been joined by other oil-rich states, including Kuwait, Qatar, Bahrain and the Gulf States, all of whom said that “they “have decided to answer the call of President Hadi to protect Yemen and his […]

The former US envoy to the United Nations writes in the NY Times that bombing Iran is the only way to stop a nuclear arms race.

Sappers blew up the bomb, and security forces are trying to track down who placed it there.

The method developed by these Israeli scientists overcomes the network isolation challenge by identifying the computer’s operating temperature.

More Articles from Tzvi Ben-Gedalyahu
Druze from the Golan Heights gather in the village of Majdal Shams requesting that the area to revert to being under the authority of the Syrian government.

The main suspect confessed to passing on information to Syria through the Internet.

Palestinian Authority TV broadcasts incitement from children's school theater.

Has anyone asked Obama why Netanyahu should even think about agreeing to a Palestinian Authority country?

Israel reportedly wants to change the names to Hebrew, which would affront Muslim sensitivities.

The non-binding vote approves funds for imposing sanctions if Iran violates a deal.

The White House says another foreign policy failure proves Obama is doing something right, but it not clear exactly what.

The former US envoy to the United Nations writes in the NY Times that bombing Iran is the only way to stop a nuclear arms race.

Authorities have ruled out terror but don’t know of the co-pilot’s motives.

Why is the black kettle that whistles to Arabs to vote called “democratic” and the one that urges Jews to vote called “racist?”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/letter-reveals-rav-ovadia-reversed-land-for-peace-ruling-in-2003/2013/10/09/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: