web analytics
August 28, 2015 / 13 Elul, 5775
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post


A Lawless Society


President Elect Obama

A lawless society is a depressing place to live because it’s a place devoid of law. And while going lawless might be appealing, we aren’t talking about an end to laws requiring you to wear bicycle helmets or drink small sodas. Not even laws ordering you to recycle, pay taxes and enlist during a war. These are laws, but they’re also ordinances, commands and compulsions. They are not really any different from your parents telling you to wash behind your ears or a mugger ordering you to give him your money. They might be right or wrong, but they aren’t law.

Law exists apart from what a group of people at any given time want you to do. That is why the aged nature of the United States Constitution is a strength. The farther away we travel from 1788, the less that the foibles and frailties of the Framers affect us. The transitory human things fall away leaving only the essence of law.

A Bill of Rights drafted today would look very different than it did back then. Not only would there be no Second Amendment, but most of the others would read dramatically different. There would be few severe restrictions on government power. Nor would there be unlimited Freedom of Speech. The entire thing would run a few thousand pages and would be filled with all sorts of escape clauses, which when added together would render the whole thing meaningless.

Take for example the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which includes dozens of new rights, such as the right of asylum, the right to environmental protection and consumer protection, and the right to social security, in addition to the more basic rights familiar to Americans, but it comes with a simple addendum.

“Any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by this Charter must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others.”

Which is to say there is freedom of speech, only until a compelling argument can be made why banning someone’s freedom of speech will help protect the general interests of the European Union or the rights of others to have environmental protection and social security.

That is the essence of a lawless society, which is to say that there are oodles and oodles of law, but it’s merely a complicated way for those in power to enforce their will on others. If you want to force people to do something, all you need to do is study enough clauses, lay out your reasoning and it’s done.

It’s law in the same sense that a mugger putting a gun to your head is law. He has a gun and he makes the laws. The laws don’t apply to him. They don’t apply in any larger universal fashion. The mugger can choose to suspend any laws at his whim, because he has a gun.

The United States has drifted into lawlessness, into laws that are the guns of government. Want to force everyone to buy health insurance? Pass a law. Ignore any questions of legality because legality doesn’t matter. If people come out to protest, send out your SEIU thugs to beat them. If you lose your Senate majority, use Reconciliation to pass it. If the Supreme Court threatens to investigate the Constitutionality of the law, threaten the Court.

The only thing separating tactics like these from the mugger on the corner is public interest. Which is to say that the government is playing Robin Hood. It isn’t mugging you because it likes the smell of money, but because it wants to help those less fortunate. Robin Hood was rebelling against the illegal authority of the Sheriff of Nottingham. And our government is rebelling against the authority of… the people and the law.

The government is the outlaw, doing what it likes because it must resist all the “powerful interests,” the most powerful of them being the Middle Class. The Revolution becomes permanent, with the Reds in power constantly rebelling against the bourgeois capitalists by raising taxes and outlawing soda. Every year, the outlaws swing out of the trees, rob the merchants and ride back to Washington D.C. for a glorious feast over the stolen goods, which they may in some small way share with a few peasants, to secure their support.

About the Author: Daniel Greenfield is an Israeli born blogger and columnist, and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. His work covers American, European and Israeli politics as well as the War on Terror. His writing can be found at http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/ These opinions do not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Jewish Press.

The author's opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Jewish Press.

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

9 Responses to “A Lawless Society”

  1. Gil Gilman says:

    Interesting babble considering the recent Supreme Court conservative activism. If Greenfield was a Manhattan dweller, I would be afraid he had added too much scotch to his tea. But since his organization is in lala land he was probably taking it neat.

    David Horowitz accused the SCPL and Chip Berlet in particular, of being "so tendentious, so filled with transparent misrepresentations and smears…" So then Greenfield in being tendentious, himself, has slapped himself on the right cheek, and followed that with a slap on the left to make sure his face is pointing in the right direction withal.

    So what we now have is that the Sheriff of Nottingham and his brother the Abbot of St. Mary's, apparently representing the conservative side, in constant battle, with Robin Hood and his overly merry fellows, apparently representing the liberal side, over who will receive the benefits from fleecing the common folk.

    Greenfield, apparently, is in favor of the kind of freedom wherein the Robber Barons control the wealth and everyone buys their goods from the company store. "Last week we witnessed Obama playing Robin Hood," and this week we witnessed the Supreme Court playing The Sheriff.

    He claims, "The left ushered in a lawless society…" Really? In Minnesota it is the conservatives who are doing the ignoring and tossing aside. I wonder if Greenfield realizes how many of his comments pertain to himself and his ilk as well as to the hated enemy. The blog posted here resembles nothing better than the ramblings of a paranoiac.

    I am neither a conservative or a liberal, nor anything in between, nor anything at either extremity (if it is a linear path at all). I am merely a member of the common folk, calmly hoeing my potatoes and watching these giants gnashing their teeth at each other and hurling stones to see how many of my potatoes I can keep.

  2. Gil Gilman says:

    It seems that I must define "lala land" in my usage since it appears not infrequently in my posts. LaLa land refers to a mythical world of ones personal imagination, where everything exists solely as imagined, and reason is what ever one happens to be thinking at the moment. Lala land is where not a few reside, though the inhabitants may not agree entirely with each other at every instant, and may be totally opposed to each other 😉

  3. Gayle Gilman says:

    I know all about Lala land. It has a door that you can enter & exit by. I go there to paint, sketch, be alone. I can invent my own reality & turn the music up good & loud to tune out

  4. Gayle Gilman says:

    I hate facebook!! Things disappear & hide on me when I'm right in the middle of saying something. And the enter button presses itself. So where was I … Yes, when I visit Lala land I know where I'm going & know when I'm leaving ( at least I hope so) even though I don't know what time it is when I'm there. And I think it keeps me sane, silencing all the voices screaming for attention with their half truths & colossal lies.

  5. Gil Gilman says:

    William Haworth After reading, your link, I can't decide whether you agree that each one has dirty hands of the non-hoeing potatoes variety, or that you believe the common folk are to blame for putting them there. If the latter, then I must say in my defense that I am only a member of the common folk as pertaining to the LaLa land of Greenfield's mythology. 😉 If the former than I need merely quote יְשַׁעְיָהוּ,
    ה וַנְּהִי כַטָּמֵא כֻּלָּנוּ, וּכְבֶגֶד עִדִּים כָּל-צִדְקֹתֵינוּ; וַנָּבֶל כֶּעָלֶה כֻּלָּנוּ, וַעֲו‍ֹנֵנוּ כָּרוּחַ יִשָּׂאֻנוּ. ו וְאֵין-קוֹרֵא בְשִׁמְךָ, מִתְעוֹרֵר לְהַחֲזִיק בָּךְ: כִּי-הִסְתַּרְתָּ פָנֶיךָ מִמֶּנּוּ, וַתְּמוּגֵנוּ בְּיַד-עֲו‍ֹנֵנוּ. ז וְעַתָּה יְהוָה, אָבִינוּ אָתָּה; אֲנַחְנוּ הַחֹמֶר וְאַתָּה יֹצְרֵנוּ, וּמַעֲשֵׂה יָדְךָ כֻּלָּנוּ.

  6. William Haworth says:

    Only that (1) societies have always been lawless and governments oppressive (2) because most people don't want to expend the effort lawful self-government requires of them–therefore choosing oppression. (3) The rest of us are along for the ride but what most people think are the great controversies of the moment don't affect our real being.

  7. Gil Gilman says:

    I see my role as a voice crying from the potato field, (peas, beans and squash also) hoping to wake up a few people lest they continue in their zombie like trek to the emotional beat of all the current wannabe gunmen. Since farmland is the latest Hot Commodity, that can only mean one thing… 😉

  8. Muriel Coudurier-Curveur says:

    The lawlessness isn't new. It was brought by the US Supreme Court, when it designed G. Bush Jr. as President of the United States, even though the US Constitution doesn't allow such a move. That document mandates instead that the Senate and the House speakers be insuring a joint presidency pro tem, until either a full recount is achieved, or a new election organized.
    Ever since, from Patriot Plan to limitless imprisonment and from filibuster to executive privilege, it's been one fast tumble in which the Congress -both parties together- and the executive seem intent on destroying what's left of the US democracy.
    Please, don't agitate the scarecrow of Unions. I lived 30 years in the US, and unions have had less and less power.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Arkansas Sen. Tom Cotton.
Sen. Cotton to Visit Israel for More Ammunition against Iran Deal
Latest Blogs Stories
haredim-no-women-allowed-sign

The Halacha of shmirat einayim (guarding one’s eyes) is incumbent on the MAN; it’s his obligation

Doug Goldstein

Dem. presidential candidate Doug Shreffler talks about his campaign & its motto “as good as it gets”

Jewish Press Blogger, Jordana Brown

I’ve decided to move away from my safety net-and I wouldn’t change that decision for anything.

Was “Jerusalem” the song Matisyahu planned to perform? It was the PERFECT response to BDS campaign

If the world’s winds of hatred bring Jews to Israel we are ready, joyfully offering them a home here

At what age should the realization start setting in for kids that we live in an uncertain society?

Spain’s SeaWorld canceled Zionist-spy dolphin’s performance unless it supports a Palestinian state

How does the Iranian deal affect anti-terrorist legislation adopted by a number of US states?

Shabbat afternoon soccer games, a tradition in Israel’s league, may become a thing of the past.

Calling the Jewish Press‘closest thing to a frum English-language weekly’ insults the publication

So long as Jews dance for the sheer pleasure of thanking God, Israel will never be defeated!

Why are wealthy people less likely to gossip? So if you get rich you’ll cut down on Lashon Hora!

Matisyahu was bounced from a music festival because he wouldn’t sign pro-BDS, anti-Israel manifesto.

Danon is still young, perhaps one day he’ll succeed Bibi. Representing Israel in UN is good training

I think it has been a major tactical mistake for Israel to consider Iran a particularly Israeli problem. And it is of crucial importance for Israel and Israelis to stop thinking that we have any influence on international leaders when it comes to anything, including international policy re: Iran. That’s why I think that Yair […]

More Articles from Daniel Greenfield
U.S. Senate

Key Iran Lobby figures had been major donors to both Biden and Kerry when they were in the Senate,

Obama on Iran Deal

If the Iran deal passes, Obama’s WH becomes world’s leading financier of terrorism against Americans

We have met the enemy; He is in the White House.

After obsequious claims of devotion to Israel, Obama took to criticizing Israel on peace process

The gap isn’t between Israeli and American Jews-it’s between American Jews and the rest of the world

It’s Time for Israel to Recognize the Royal Republic of Ladonia!

Dead Yazidi children won’t inspire any protests or much in the way of outrage.

It’s because in Gaza, Hamas and the UNRWA are the same thing.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/sultan-knish/a-lawless-society/2012/06/24/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: