web analytics
November 1, 2014 / 8 Heshvan, 5775
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



A Lawless Society


President Elect Obama

A lawless society is a depressing place to live because it’s a place devoid of law. And while going lawless might be appealing, we aren’t talking about an end to laws requiring you to wear bicycle helmets or drink small sodas. Not even laws ordering you to recycle, pay taxes and enlist during a war. These are laws, but they’re also ordinances, commands and compulsions. They are not really any different from your parents telling you to wash behind your ears or a mugger ordering you to give him your money. They might be right or wrong, but they aren’t law.

Law exists apart from what a group of people at any given time want you to do. That is why the aged nature of the United States Constitution is a strength. The farther away we travel from 1788, the less that the foibles and frailties of the Framers affect us. The transitory human things fall away leaving only the essence of law.

A Bill of Rights drafted today would look very different than it did back then. Not only would there be no Second Amendment, but most of the others would read dramatically different. There would be few severe restrictions on government power. Nor would there be unlimited Freedom of Speech. The entire thing would run a few thousand pages and would be filled with all sorts of escape clauses, which when added together would render the whole thing meaningless.

Take for example the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, which includes dozens of new rights, such as the right of asylum, the right to environmental protection and consumer protection, and the right to social security, in addition to the more basic rights familiar to Americans, but it comes with a simple addendum.

“Any limitation on the exercise of the rights and freedoms recognised by this Charter must be provided for by law and respect the essence of those rights and freedoms. Subject to the principle of proportionality, limitations may be made only if they are necessary and genuinely meet objectives of general interest recognised by the Union or the need to protect the rights and freedoms of others.”

Which is to say there is freedom of speech, only until a compelling argument can be made why banning someone’s freedom of speech will help protect the general interests of the European Union or the rights of others to have environmental protection and social security.

That is the essence of a lawless society, which is to say that there are oodles and oodles of law, but it’s merely a complicated way for those in power to enforce their will on others. If you want to force people to do something, all you need to do is study enough clauses, lay out your reasoning and it’s done.

It’s law in the same sense that a mugger putting a gun to your head is law. He has a gun and he makes the laws. The laws don’t apply to him. They don’t apply in any larger universal fashion. The mugger can choose to suspend any laws at his whim, because he has a gun.

The United States has drifted into lawlessness, into laws that are the guns of government. Want to force everyone to buy health insurance? Pass a law. Ignore any questions of legality because legality doesn’t matter. If people come out to protest, send out your SEIU thugs to beat them. If you lose your Senate majority, use Reconciliation to pass it. If the Supreme Court threatens to investigate the Constitutionality of the law, threaten the Court.

The only thing separating tactics like these from the mugger on the corner is public interest. Which is to say that the government is playing Robin Hood. It isn’t mugging you because it likes the smell of money, but because it wants to help those less fortunate. Robin Hood was rebelling against the illegal authority of the Sheriff of Nottingham. And our government is rebelling against the authority of… the people and the law.

The government is the outlaw, doing what it likes because it must resist all the “powerful interests,” the most powerful of them being the Middle Class. The Revolution becomes permanent, with the Reds in power constantly rebelling against the bourgeois capitalists by raising taxes and outlawing soda. Every year, the outlaws swing out of the trees, rob the merchants and ride back to Washington D.C. for a glorious feast over the stolen goods, which they may in some small way share with a few peasants, to secure their support.

About the Author: Daniel Greenfield is an Israeli born blogger and columnist, and a Shillman Fellow at the David Horowitz Freedom Center. His work covers American, European and Israeli politics as well as the War on Terror. His writing can be found at http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/. The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not represent the views of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

9 Responses to “A Lawless Society”

  1. Gil Gilman says:

    Interesting babble considering the recent Supreme Court conservative activism. If Greenfield was a Manhattan dweller, I would be afraid he had added too much scotch to his tea. But since his organization is in lala land he was probably taking it neat.

    David Horowitz accused the SCPL and Chip Berlet in particular, of being "so tendentious, so filled with transparent misrepresentations and smears…" So then Greenfield in being tendentious, himself, has slapped himself on the right cheek, and followed that with a slap on the left to make sure his face is pointing in the right direction withal.

    So what we now have is that the Sheriff of Nottingham and his brother the Abbot of St. Mary's, apparently representing the conservative side, in constant battle, with Robin Hood and his overly merry fellows, apparently representing the liberal side, over who will receive the benefits from fleecing the common folk.

    Greenfield, apparently, is in favor of the kind of freedom wherein the Robber Barons control the wealth and everyone buys their goods from the company store. "Last week we witnessed Obama playing Robin Hood," and this week we witnessed the Supreme Court playing The Sheriff.

    He claims, "The left ushered in a lawless society…" Really? In Minnesota it is the conservatives who are doing the ignoring and tossing aside. I wonder if Greenfield realizes how many of his comments pertain to himself and his ilk as well as to the hated enemy. The blog posted here resembles nothing better than the ramblings of a paranoiac.

    I am neither a conservative or a liberal, nor anything in between, nor anything at either extremity (if it is a linear path at all). I am merely a member of the common folk, calmly hoeing my potatoes and watching these giants gnashing their teeth at each other and hurling stones to see how many of my potatoes I can keep.

  2. Gil Gilman says:

    It seems that I must define "lala land" in my usage since it appears not infrequently in my posts. LaLa land refers to a mythical world of ones personal imagination, where everything exists solely as imagined, and reason is what ever one happens to be thinking at the moment. Lala land is where not a few reside, though the inhabitants may not agree entirely with each other at every instant, and may be totally opposed to each other ;-)

  3. Gayle Gilman says:

    I know all about Lala land. It has a door that you can enter & exit by. I go there to paint, sketch, be alone. I can invent my own reality & turn the music up good & loud to tune out

  4. Gayle Gilman says:

    I hate facebook!! Things disappear & hide on me when I'm right in the middle of saying something. And the enter button presses itself. So where was I … Yes, when I visit Lala land I know where I'm going & know when I'm leaving ( at least I hope so) even though I don't know what time it is when I'm there. And I think it keeps me sane, silencing all the voices screaming for attention with their half truths & colossal lies.

  5. Gil Gilman says:

    William Haworth After reading, your link, I can't decide whether you agree that each one has dirty hands of the non-hoeing potatoes variety, or that you believe the common folk are to blame for putting them there. If the latter, then I must say in my defense that I am only a member of the common folk as pertaining to the LaLa land of Greenfield's mythology. ;-) If the former than I need merely quote יְשַׁעְיָהוּ,
    ה וַנְּהִי כַטָּמֵא כֻּלָּנוּ, וּכְבֶגֶד עִדִּים כָּל-צִדְקֹתֵינוּ; וַנָּבֶל כֶּעָלֶה כֻּלָּנוּ, וַעֲו‍ֹנֵנוּ כָּרוּחַ יִשָּׂאֻנוּ. ו וְאֵין-קוֹרֵא בְשִׁמְךָ, מִתְעוֹרֵר לְהַחֲזִיק בָּךְ: כִּי-הִסְתַּרְתָּ פָנֶיךָ מִמֶּנּוּ, וַתְּמוּגֵנוּ בְּיַד-עֲו‍ֹנֵנוּ. ז וְעַתָּה יְהוָה, אָבִינוּ אָתָּה; אֲנַחְנוּ הַחֹמֶר וְאַתָּה יֹצְרֵנוּ, וּמַעֲשֵׂה יָדְךָ כֻּלָּנוּ.

  6. William Haworth says:

    Only that (1) societies have always been lawless and governments oppressive (2) because most people don't want to expend the effort lawful self-government requires of them–therefore choosing oppression. (3) The rest of us are along for the ride but what most people think are the great controversies of the moment don't affect our real being.

  7. Gil Gilman says:

    I see my role as a voice crying from the potato field, (peas, beans and squash also) hoping to wake up a few people lest they continue in their zombie like trek to the emotional beat of all the current wannabe gunmen. Since farmland is the latest Hot Commodity, that can only mean one thing… ;-)

  8. Muriel Coudurier-Curveur says:

    The lawlessness isn't new. It was brought by the US Supreme Court, when it designed G. Bush Jr. as President of the United States, even though the US Constitution doesn't allow such a move. That document mandates instead that the Senate and the House speakers be insuring a joint presidency pro tem, until either a full recount is achieved, or a new election organized.
    Ever since, from Patriot Plan to limitless imprisonment and from filibuster to executive privilege, it's been one fast tumble in which the Congress -both parties together- and the executive seem intent on destroying what's left of the US democracy.
    Please, don't agitate the scarecrow of Unions. I lived 30 years in the US, and unions have had less and less power.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Yehudah Glick on the Temple Mount.
Yehuda Glick’s Condition Stabilizing, “He Was Very Lucky” (1:00 PM)
Latest Blogs Stories
Jo-map

Let’s cut to the chase! The people who call themselves Palestinians are simply Arabs (Muslims) who came to this area from several Islamic regimes. This is not my opinion but rather what their leaders clearly say.

YG

Please pray for a complete recovery, רפואה שלימה for Yehuda Yehoshua Ben Rivka Ita Breindel Glick.

12

Obama/Kerry hate Bibi, because he is what they aren’t: smart and was a real soldier in the top unit.

Adolf Hitler and the representative of the Palestinian Arabs, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseini, December, 1941.

Palestinian anti-Semitism in 2014 is more extreme and mainstream than German A/S in the 1930s.

Here are 5 quick facts that prove Jerusalem was NEVER A Muslim Holy City.

For further proof that there’s no justice for Jews in this world, the United Nations Security sic Council is planning to meet about Israel’s building plans. (Reuters) – The U.N. Security Council will hold an emergency meeting this week on recent tensions between Israel and the Palestinians in East Jerusalem due to Israel’s plans to build more […]

When is it a good idea to accept a “draw” and when is it better not to do so?

The AlephBet soup of American Jewish organizations must demand an apology and retraction from the Obama Administration to the Jewish People for this crass and vulgar insult to the leader of the Jewish People.

How bad is it? It is a battle royal tearing at the very heart of the yeshiva world.

Zionism brought Yesha to life, attracting Jews and Arabs to the area.

The “bag tax” is eco-terrorism against the Israeli consumer. Have our MK’s reviewed any studies on its environmental impact, or is it all just touchy-feely?

MS. PSAKI: He asked me if we thought he (molotov-cocktail throwing Arab-US citizen was a terrorist, and I said no.

Abbas’s charge of racism spans the entirety of Israeli society.

Why do people often sabotage their own success ?

The best locations for more housing is Yesha and Jerusalem because of convenience and low land cost

Weeping for the heroism of our soldiers, the miracle of our return home, the endless years of exile

More Articles from Daniel Greenfield
467976-b437d904-1dd3-11e4-96c6-79c9953f9ece

Dead Yazidi children won’t inspire any protests or much in the way of outrage.

UNRWA Rocket Logo

It’s because in Gaza, Hamas and the UNRWA are the same thing.

Obama went to begin the Arab Spring in Egypt which is still his target; Israel is just the lever.

It is not Cain’s fault that he kills. It is Abel’s fault that he builds.

No matter what the PLO did, you blamed Israel. Like you blamed America, no matter what the Viet Cong did.

Passover is a road that we still travel, a long journey from slavery to freedom.

We’ve become very good at symptom management and at not thinking about the underlying problem.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/sultan-knish/a-lawless-society/2012/06/24/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: