web analytics
April 25, 2015 / 6 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Columns »

Shemini: Why Did God Reject Nadav and Avihu


Shemini.jpg

In this week’s parsha, we see the sudden and disturbing death of two of Aharon’s sons, Nadav and Avihu. In exploring the text more closely, what earlier Biblical story shows parallel themes and language to this story, and what is the meaning behind this connection?

About the Author: Rabbi David Fohrman is the dean of Aleph Beta Academy. He has taught at Johns Hopkins University, and was a lead writer and editor for ArtScroll's Talmud translation project. Aleph Beta creates videos to help people experience Torah in way that is relevant and meaningful to them. for more videos, visit: alephbeta.org.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

7 Responses to “Shemini: Why Did God Reject Nadav and Avihu”

  1. Jan Barczuk says:

    Great comments! Thank you.

  2. Laurel Hobbs says:

    The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom…confirmed in your insights! Thank-you. Very thought provoking.

  3. Yes, it's great comments last Parsha, Thank you

  4. Ari Friedman says:

    thank you for your insights. there is another issue connecting the stories and perhaps the story of Noah as well and its connection to wine. the first thing noah plants is a vineyard and gets drunk. perhaps in this getting close to hashem they used alcohol incorrectly and perhaps wine plays a role in our connection hence it's role in Purim and Pesach.

  5. Alexandra Schmidt says:

    This was absolutely beautiful (I am Christian, I hope you don't mind, and never cease to marvel at the Foundation which is Judaism). Thank you so much!

  6. Gary Harper says:

    I have always considered the "foreign fires" to be analogous to the staffs of the magicians that were consumed by Moshe's staff. I also have always seen a relationship between the pair and other pairs, like Cain and Abel, neither of whose insincere attempts at seeking their blind father's blessing through either indifference or camouflaging their motive were fully acceptable to Hashem. The relationship of the tabernacle to Eden was always obvious, especially the red soil of Eden and the coverings. Adam himself was to be the original tabernacle, but he chose his own inclinations over Hashem's instructions.

  7. Gary Harper says:

    To finish.

    One who tills the fields has little time or inclination to reflect upon how good they have it, while sweating under the sun. Cain’s offering to Hashem was of “some” of the fruits of the field. It is implied that Cain did not take his offering seriously, or even begrudged having to part with it. It is implied that they were not the best of the harvest. He did not value his offering. Therein is his error.

    The herdsman has time to contemplate Hashem. Abel offered the “fat” of the “firstborn”. Of course his offering was acceptable, as he put the best before Hashem, always thinking of Hashem first.

    Hashem told Cain that his right action would still be found acceptable. The implication is that right action is preferable to any offering or sacrifice.

    Esau sold his birthright for a bowl of food. He did not value it. Jacob stole Esau’s blessing through lies and subterfuge. Hashem does not find either of these attitudes or actions to be fully acceptable. So, He promised Esau that, in the end time, Esau would throw off his brother’s yoke for good. And Jacob still had some hard things to learn, something to wrestle with, a river to cross, before he earned a name for himself. Right action is far preferable to sacrifices or offerings.

    In times of peace, the dweller in tents is preferred. In times of turmoil, the wanderer over the lands is preferred. Man always favors the wanderer; and woman favors the one who stays home.

    In the end time, the dweller and the wanderer will be one and the same. The lion and the lamb, they will be one. Cain of the humid fields of the river bottoms, Esau of the wild mountains, Jacob of the tents of the plains, and Abel of the pastures of the hills, will all be as one. In all of the corners of the earth, they are found. The ox, the ass, the lamb, and the lion, will all coexist in the peaceable kingdom found within a man. This one is your tzaddik, and is the land promised to each of you, is your true inheritance. Become one. You were once that way, when you were first born; you need only return.

    So, the narratives of the many pairs you find in the scriptures are all the same. The dual natures of men must be reconciled, and only then can Hashem be approached. There is only one acceptable way to do this. Hashem cannot be approached by men who have conflicting natures or motives wrestling inside of them. Only he who has first wrestled with himself can approach close to Hashem without fear, can approach the Holiest of Holies at any time. Indeed, Hashem is always waiting.

    To bring the foreign fires of our own egos before Hashem is not found to be an acceptable offering. It is not a pure sacrifice. It is not brought in peace; it is brought in the spirit of conquest. To be fired up by the wrong spirit is a grave error. Such a vessel ultimately be unfavorably consumed; as were all the gods and religions that were thrown down before Pharaoh as serpents, by the staff of a shepherd.

    The one who fully contains and reconciles within all of these many pairings found in Torah is, of course, mashiach.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
"Killing Jews is worship that draws us closer to Allah." That's his Jihad. What's yours? - An ad campaign sponsored by  the American Freedom Defense Initiative.
MTA Hopes to Change Rule, Ban ‘Killing Jews’ Anti-Jihad Ad
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

In her diary, Anne Frank wrote words that provided hope for a humanity faced with suffering.

Leff-042415

The Arizal taught this same approach, making the point that the Torah would never mention wicked people and their sins if there was not great depth involved from which we are to learn from.

Staum-042415

Humility is not achieved when all is well and life is peachy but rather when times are trying and challenging.

In order to be free of the negative consequences of violating a shvu’ah or a neder, the shvu’ah or neder themselves must be annulled.

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

He feared the people would have a change of heart and support Rechavam.

Ramifications Of A Printers Error
‘The Note Holder’s Burden of Proof’
(Kesubos 83b)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

In this case one could reason that by applying halach achar harov we could permit the forbidden bird as well.

“What a way to spend a Sunday afternoon,” my husband remarked. “Well, baruch Hashem we are safe, there was no accident, and I’m sure there is a good reason for everything that happened to us,” I mused.

The answer to this question is based on one of the greatest shortcomings of man – self-limiting beliefs.

Myth that niddah=dirty stopped many women from accepting laws of family purity and must be shattered

In every generation is the challenge to purge the culture of our exile from our minds and our hearts

Rabbi Fohrman connects the metzora purification process with the korban pesach.

The day after Israel was declared a State, everyone recited Hallel and people danced in the streets.

More Articles from Rabbi David Fohrman
Tazria-Metzora_lecture

Rabbi Fohrman connects the metzora purification process with the korban pesach.

Parshat Shemini

What do we learn about overcoming loss from the argument between Moses and Aaron’s remaining 2 sons?

Rabbi Fohrman considers what it mean to bring God into this world through space and through time.

Over and over, the text tells us about “keeping” Shabbat, about holiness, and a covenant – but why?

How the 3 partitions of the mishkan each relate to a layer of creation, aiding our connection to God

The keruvim, or cherubs, appear in the tabernacle in three different places. What is their meaning?

Be Forewarned: Rabbi Fohrman on our forefathers and foremothers forming the law.

Connecting the Ten Commandments to the story of Moses and the Burning Bush.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/torah/shemini-why-did-god-reject-nadav-and-avihu/2014/03/21/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: