Photo Credit:
John Podhoretz (seen here on The Daily Show) was booed by the 92nd Street Y audience and shushed by the moderator, Forward editor Jane Eisner, when he defended Israel from claims that Israel was responsible for a recent academic boycott

At that point, with Eisner trying to shush him – as Podhoretz experienced it – and the audience booing and hissing, the Commentary editor got up and walked out.

Whether Podhoretz’s behavior was out of line or understandable is probably impossible to judge, certainly not for anyone who wasn’t there, and maybe even for those who were.  Given that Eisner herself wrote that members of the audience were “enraged” by Podhoretz’s defense of Israel from Ben-Ami’s criticism, perhaps that would have been the moment for her to “rein in” the crowd and lower the tension.  Who knows?

Advertisement

But it is quite fascinating to learn that total bedlam broke out in the audience in response to Podhoretz’s defense of Israel from an attack blaming the Jewish State for the ASA’s boycott.  That is the kind of thing one expects at a Students for Justice in Palestine event, not a talk  held at what is ostensibly still a Jewish institution, one which began in 1874 as the Young Men’s Hebrew Association.

So a second question arises: was the 92nd Street Y audience so primed to take a position critical of Israel because of the kind of programming, including the anti-Israel speakers it has invited recently, some of whom are the biggest proponents of economic and legal warfare against Israel, Roger Waters and Alice Walker? Or were those speakers invited because the 92nd Street Y audience is one that was already primed to be critical of the Jewish State?

ORIGINAL EVENT SCHEDULED TO INCLUDE ONLY J STREET VIEW

And a final note of interest.  When doing research about this panel discussion, a notice about the event turned up on the Internet that reveals something worth noting: apparently the topic was originally going to be addressed by only one speaker.  Originally, the only person who was going to talk at the 92nd Street Y about what it means to be pro-Israel in America today was J Street’s Jeremy Ben-Ami.

The original blurb announcing the event read this way:

What does it mean for the American Jewish community to be pro-Israel? Is it acceptable for American Jews to criticize Israeli politics, as Israelis do?  J Street president Jeremy Ben-Ami joins us for a discussion of what it means to be pro-Israel in America. Jeremy Ben-Ami is Executive Director of J Street and JStreetPac, the political voice of the pro-Israel, pro-peace movement.  From 2003-4 he was Policy Director for Howard Dean’s presidential campaign, and from 1992 through 1996, he worked for former President Bill Clinton, serving for two years as the President’s Deputy Domestic Policy Advisor.

This appears to be the original blurb for the 92nd St Y event about what it means to be pro-Israel in America. Only the J Street view was to be heard. The pictures of the other speakers must have been added later.

That’s all the blurb said.  No other panelists. One view, the J Street view.  That’s what this event was supposed to be.  One could be thankful someone had the wisdom to widen the panel to include a few more voices.  And even so, both Podhoretz and Harris of the American Jewish Committee are much more domestic policy mavens than they are policy experts on Israel.  But what does it say that an event at the 92nd Street Y about what constitutes pro-Israel in America was originally scheduled to include only one voice?

Sadly, it seems likely there would not have been any hissing or booing from the audience.

Advertisement

41 COMMENTS

  1. I would submit that the audience thinking that this was just a Jstreet event came already primed to blame israel for everything. Those in the Jewish community that are truly pro-Israel doesn’t need JStreet telling them what it means to be a Jew and proud. As far as Podhoretz acting like a small child and walking out…it doesn’t matter how the audience reacted to him. What kind of advocate is he, if he only can talk to those that agree with him? Eisner also should have had a better hold on the audience but was probably very glad that the audience was being rude to Podhoretz and it validated her own ignorance on the Middle east issues.

  2. A significant part of the “Jewish problem” is Jews. People like Ben Ami have been our curse since we left Egypt (remember Korach?). Would that the earth would open and swallow them up. In the absence if that redeeming miracle, I swear to fight these bastards with every ounce of strength in my body. We ill never be rid of them. We must view them as a test from the Almighty. If we let them win, the Jewish people will cease to exist.

  3. Eisner is a bully who wraps herself in the toga of feminism. She is as fair as limes are sweet. Having her as a moderator was a sure signal of the 92 Y’s stacking of the panel. This is another sign that we have lost the ability to listen to the other but in these days of bread and circus we want blood to dip our morsels in.
    To her credit Ms. Eisner is consistently biased and self-absorbed.

  4. I would submit that the audience thinking that this was just a Jstreet event came already primed to blame israel for everything. Those in the Jewish community that are truly pro-Israel doesn't need JStreet telling them what it means to be a Jew and proud. As far as Podhoretz acting like a small child and walking out…it doesn't matter how the audience reacted to him. What kind of advocate is he, if he only can talk to those that agree with him? Eisner also should have had a better hold on the audience but was probably very glad that the audience was being rude to Podhoretz and it validated her own ignorance on the Middle east issues.

  5. A significant part of the "Jewish problem" is Jews. People like Ben Ami have been our curse since we left Egypt (remember Korach?). Would that the earth would open and swallow them up. In the absence if that redeeming miracle, I swear to fight these bastards with every ounce of strength in my body. We ill never be rid of them. We must view them as a test from the Almighty. If we let them win, the Jewish people will cease to exist.

  6. It’s great to see such a devoted supporter of Israel when Israel’s support is dwindling under this administration. Antisemitism is alive and well in America and J Street seems to be one of the offenders – the worst kind. Their positions are not defensible, logical, excusable. Sadly enough, the enemy is from within!

  7. Another example of the totalitarian intolerance of folks on the anti-Semitic left towards pro-Israel views they so passionately despise. Free and open discussion is the last thing they want.

  8. I saw another article this morning on WaPo (http://ow.ly/rTpjy) about a meeting in Israel that occurred last month, where the topic of discussion was how to save the American Jewish community, which is increasingly intermarried and assimilated, given the rise in anti-Israel sentiment among American Jews. Reports like this reinforce my view that Israel is better off without them. Who needs a bunch of self-hating apologists? It’s a gift that dirtbags like the 92nd Street Y and it’s members would rather stay here in the States and run their ignorant mouths — Israel has real challenges, it doesn’t need a fifth column.

  9. It's great to see such a devoted supporter of Israel when Israel's support is dwindling under this administration. Antisemitism is alive and well in America and J Street seems to be one of the offenders – the worst kind. Their positions are not defensible, logical, excusable. Sadly enough, the enemy is from within!

  10. I saw another article this morning on WaPo (http://ow.ly/rTpjy) about a meeting in Israel that occurred last month, where the topic of discussion was how to save the American Jewish community, which is increasingly intermarried and assimilated, given the rise in anti-Israel sentiment among American Jews. Reports like this reinforce my view that Israel is better off without them. Who needs a bunch of self-hating apologists? It's a gift that dirtbags like the 92nd Street Y and it's members would rather stay here in the States and run their ignorant mouths — Israel has real challenges, it doesn't need a fifth column.

  11. Respect Podhoretz and not the self hating assimilated Jews !!!! They were not there for the slaughtered European Jewry and they are not there for Israel! they are leaning any way the wind blows because of their ignorance – wait soon the Muslims will start taking care of them!!

  12. When there is a single, unified voice in a panel discussion, in a topic like this, the only reason to be had is that the panel and the audience are emotionally involved in their subject matter, more so than intellectually involved. They are, in fact, in dread of an educated voice proclaiming disagreement with the accepted denouement of their soulful narrative. Thus they stop up their ears, wag their tongues and create a commotion worthy of the prophets of baal.

  13. xlnt piece lori, it is refreshing to see some resistance to the leftist propaganda and a voice that speaks in the defense of Israel for a change- we need to unite, all of us. There is a calculated war being conducted to destroy us. D LURya

  14. When there is a single, unified voice in a panel discussion, in a topic like this, the only reason to be had is that the panel and the audience are emotionally involved in their subject matter, more so than intellectually involved. They are, in fact, in dread of an educated voice proclaiming disagreement with the accepted denouement of their soulful narrative. Thus they stop up their ears, wag their tongues and create a commotion worthy of the prophets of baal.

  15. Eisner and the audience wnt to that function for one purpose only…..to bash Israel. Nothing was going to dissuade them from doing this.. They were too dumb to see or understand what the only decent person on the panel was trying to say, or perhapsthey did understand but were not prepared to acknowlege this as this might have been interpretted a a sign of support for Israel, something with is forbidden by these left wing idiots.

  16. Eisner and the audience wnt to that function for one purpose only…..to bash Israel. Nothing was going to dissuade them from doing this.. They were too dumb to see or understand what the only decent person on the panel was trying to say, or perhapsthey did understand but were not prepared to acknowlege this as this might have been interpretted a a sign of support for Israel, something with is forbidden by these left wing idiots.

  17. Dan Silagi, not sure how you somehow construed from my comment that **I** have a problem with intermarriage. You rightly inferred that I am, myself, intermarried. What I wrote was that I read an ARTICLE on the Washington Post’s website about Israeli efforts to save the Jewish American community. I stand by my statement that Israel is better off without the fools at the 92nd St Y.

  18. Shoshana McCrimmon As an intermarried Reform Jew, I don’t need saving from any Israeli, starting with Jesus of Nazareth. Nor am I a “self-hating apologist.”

    What I do need saving from are the ultra-orthodox holier-than-thou Torah-thumpers, who believe that Reform, unaffiliated, and even Conservative Jews are not really Jewish, but some kind of Unitarian Lite.

  19. Wow… I’m sure you’re completely oblivious to the intolerance in that statement. As I said, Israel is better off… and you just made the argument for that. שבת שלום

  20. Shoshana McCrimmon Come on. I read this kind of crap on this website all the time; Reform Judaism isn’t true Judaism, Reform rabbis aren’t really rabbis, etc. As for Jesus, he was born in Bethlehem, lived in Nazereth, and died in Jerusalem. Those were all parts of Israel during his lifetime, and many argue they all are part of Israel today. It’s the Haredim who are parasites and the ultra-right who want to kick sand in the Palestinians’ faces even on the rare occasions when they don’t deserve it who are giving Israel a bad name, and Podhoretz is clearly on of them. No wonder he was booed.

  21. Dan Silagi, not sure how you somehow construed from my comment that **I** have a problem with intermarriage. You rightly inferred that I am, myself, intermarried. What I wrote was that I read an ARTICLE on the Washington Post's website about Israeli efforts to save the Jewish American community. I stand by my statement that Israel is better off without the fools at the 92nd St Y.

  22. Shoshana McCrimmon As an intermarried Reform Jew, I don't need saving from any Israeli, starting with Jesus of Nazareth. Nor am I a "self-hating apologist."

    What I do need saving from are the ultra-orthodox holier-than-thou Torah-thumpers, who believe that Reform, unaffiliated, and even Conservative Jews are not really Jewish, but some kind of Unitarian Lite.

  23. Wow… I'm sure you're completely oblivious to the intolerance in that statement. As I said, Israel is better off… and you just made the argument for that. שבת שלום

  24. Shoshana McCrimmon Come on. I read this kind of crap on this website all the time; Reform Judaism isn't true Judaism, Reform rabbis aren't really rabbis, etc. As for Jesus, he was born in Bethlehem, lived in Nazereth, and died in Jerusalem. Those were all parts of Israel during his lifetime, and many argue they all are part of Israel today. It's the Haredim who are parasites and the ultra-right who want to kick sand in the Palestinians' faces even on the rare occasions when they don't deserve it who are giving Israel a bad name, and Podhoretz is clearly on of them. No wonder he was booed.

  25. As Americans get more and more “cultured” they become more and more anti Jewish to the point of conversion or simply intermarried beyond existence. Apparently Dan Silagi has not attended a Reform Synagogue recently. Reform Judaism is the a stepping stone to Modern Christianity, perhaps Unitarian might be closer. America’s Jews have forgotten Judaism and Israel for the most part. Much like the German Jews who were so German, that they forgot that they were Jewish. Hitler didn’t forget however, neither will Obama and the rest of the anti semites in the USA. It is only a matter of time before we saee a Holocaust happen here in the USA.

  26. As Americans get more and more "cultured" they become more and more anti Jewish to the point of conversion or simply intermarried beyond existence. Apparently Dan Silagi has not attended a Reform Synagogue recently. Reform Judaism is the a stepping stone to Modern Christianity, perhaps Unitarian might be closer. America's Jews have forgotten Judaism and Israel for the most part. Much like the German Jews who were so German, that they forgot that they were Jewish. Hitler didn't forget however, neither will Obama and the rest of the anti semites in the USA. It is only a matter of time before we saee a Holocaust happen here in the USA.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...