web analytics
September 19, 2014 / 24 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post
Apartment 758x530 Africa-Israel at the Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York

Africa Israel Residences, part of the Africa Israel Investments Group led by international businessman Lev Leviev, will present 7 leading projects on the The Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York on Sep 14-15, 2014.



Cockroach Curses and Jew Hunting in California Colleges

The players include several perfect archetypes, and the situation is a classic one: Anti-Israel students engage in "street theater," mimicking brutal, oppressive Israel Defense Forces soldiers. The victims, pro-Israel students, are traumatized and believe themselves unable to stand up for themselves.

Najib Hamideh and other Students for Justice in Palestine bar students entry to Claremont McKenna College cafeteria in "Israeli checkpoint street theater demonstration," March 4, 2013

Najib Hamideh and other Students for Justice in Palestine bar students entry to Claremont McKenna College cafeteria in "Israeli checkpoint street theater demonstration," March 4, 2013

Hyper-politicized college student programs dealing with the Middle East these days often end up as actual or virtual shoving matches between two ideological camps: those that support Israel and those that denounce her.  Questions about ideology — is Israel defending itself from terrorists or murdering innocent children — morph into questions about whether the Israel’s campus advocates, or Israel’s campus enemies, were the ones to curse, hit, shove, or obstruct, or the ones to lie about some or all of the above.

We saw this recently at Brooklyn College, where four Jewish pro-Israel students were booted from a speech sponsored by a public university on the demand of a single twenty-something advocate for economic and political warfare against Israel. That (non) Student for Justice in Palestine organizer had been given control of the event, the room where it took place, and the university’s entire security apparatus.

Alone among a raft of public security and university faculty and administration, this one man claimed the Jewish students had been disruptive and had to be, and were, removed.  The claims of allegedly aggressive Jews attempting to stifle debate and bar academic freedom become merged with claims of aggressive Israeli soldiers impeding innocents at Middle East checkpoints.

That story only fell apart, and the university was only forced to abandon its initial blame of the pro-Israel students — and to agree that they’d done nothing wrong — after a tape of the event surfaced that made it impossible to believe the version put out by the anti-Israel partisans. Only then did a university “investigation” follow, which concluded the Jewish students had been wrongfully ejected from the public event, which was a publicly funded call for the boycott of Israeli products.  Your tax dollars at work.

Another story is now unfolding in California, where another public attack on Israel precipitated contradictory accounts of improper conduct by Israel’s advocates and enemies.

Because what happened on the ground so quickly and so often becomes grist for the ideological mill of Israel’s enemies, it’s worth bearing down to determine as clearly as possible what really happened, why, and whether it provides any guidance for how to handle future events.  There will be many more.  This case is also instructive for seeing who rallies to which side, and why.

This is the first article in a series looking at a specific incident that took place at Claremont McKenna College in California, and how and whether it is possible to tease out what happened and why.

The players include several perfect archetypes, and the situation is a classic one:  Anti-Israel students engage in “street theater,” mimicking brutal, oppressive Israel Defense Forces soldiers. The victims, pro-Israel students, are traumatized and believe themselves unable to stand up for themselves.  In this case a pro-Israel student goes to an Israeli professor seeking his help.  The professor is annoyed by the street theater, is provoked by the anti-Israel students, and bad things happen, including claims by the anti-Israel students that their free speech rights were violated.

This article will lay out the basic facts, as best as they can be discerned. Subsequent articles will look at how each school made a determination about what happened, what evidence was made available, how much outside “information” played a role, and what, if anything, can be learned from this case.

PART ONE: MARCH 4, 2013

Jewish Israeli professor Yaron Raviv, walked up to a peaceful Students for Justice in Palestine “street theater mock Israeli checkpoint” demonstration at Claremont McKenna College.  The professor had been watching the demonstration for awhile. He then approached the demonstrators and told them they weren’t allowed to perform and they had to leave.  The professor then tried to get other school officials to shut down the pre-approved demonstration.

A kefiyah-clad Arab Palestinian student, Najib Hamideh, politely asked the professor to show his identification (it was after 5:00, and he was concerned about a visitor on campus without permission), the professor turns on him, calls him a “f[expletive deleted] little cockroach,” asked where the student goes to school, then says all students from that school are cockroaches.  The professor then showed the public safety officer his school ID, and then the professor left.

The word “cockroach” is a racial slur, according to the student and his advocates, either because it’s what Israelis call Arab Palestinians, or because “language gets meaning from context” and cockroach is a disgraceful, dehumanizing term, especially when used by a Jewish Israeli professor about an Arab Palestinian student.

That’s one version of an incident that took place at Claremont McKenna College on March 4. It’s the one told by the demonstrators, the Students for Justice in Palestine.

Here’s the other version, the one told by the professor:

A professor, Yaron Raviv, gets a call from a Jewish student asking for help because student protesters pretending to be thuggish IDF soldiers are blocking the cafeteria and intimidating anyone who wants to pass through, demanding other students first show their school ID cards.  The professor goes to investigate, sees students in camouflage standing shoulder to shoulder in front of the main entrance to the cafeteria, sees some other students handing out flyers, and sees students on the side crying.  When the students insist the professor show his ID, he refuses and goes inside, and  tells the dining hall manager that the students can protest but not block the entrance.

The dining hall manager tells the students to move, and initially they do, but as soon as the manager goes inside they get back into formation, shoulder to shoulder, in front of the entrance. The professor calls the public safety office and goes outside to speak with an officer. While the professor is walking, one of the students, Najib Hamideh, dressed like an Israeli soldier, leaves the demonstration.

The student gets in the professor’s face and says, “Who are you? Are you a faculty here? Or a visitor? Show me your ID. If you are a visitor you cannot be on campus ground after 5pm.” The professor goes up to the officer, to whom he shows his ID, the student sees it and says to the professor, “oh, you’re faculty!  I will hunt you down!”

With that, the professor, a Jewish Israeli, loses his cool and calls the student a “f[expletive deleted] little cockroach.”

The student gleefully responds: “oh, I’ve got you now!”

With that, the professor turns, goes over to the student who had originally sought his help, tells that student “the public safety officer will take over from now,” and walks away.

The versions diverge on several points: (1) did the demonstrators block the main entrance to the CMC cafeteria; (2) did the professor try to shut down a pre-approved, peaceful demonstration; (3) did the student say “I will hunt you down” before the professor called him a “f[expletive deleted little cockroach," if at all, and did the professor know that the student demonstrator was of Arab Palestinian heritage.

There have been several investigations of the incident.  One investigation was conducted by Claremont McKenna College, the school at which the demonstration and the incident at issue occurred and at which the professor, Yaron Raviv, is a faculty member.  A second investigation was conducted by Pitzer College, a member of the Claremont University 5 school Consortium.  Most of the students involved in the "Israeli checkpoint street theater demonstration" on March 4 were Pitzer students, and the one involved in the confrontation at issue, Najib Hamideh, is a Pitzer junior.

The school officials have been completely closed-mouthed, referring reporters to their respective communications officers.  The communications officers, in turn, refuse to say anything more than that they "stand by" the statement issued by each school upon the completion of their respective investigations.

And even more unfortunately, the investigations of the two schools concluded with conflicting factual findings, even though, presumably, the two schools were able to share any and all information, witnesses and documents, and both schools stated that they cooperated with each other.

The next article will look more closely at the different reviews and sets of findings, but the final review for Claremont McKenna found that: (1) Professor Raviv's language was inappropriate and unprofessional, but, given the context, did not constitute a violation of the school's harassment policy; (2) the SJP event was not in compliance with Claremont's Demonstrations Policy because the demonstrators blocked access to the cafeteria and impeded with students' freedom of movement; and (3) Prof. Raviv did not improperly interfere with or attempt to stop the event.

Pitzer College, however, found that (1) there was no violation of Claremont's Demonstrations Policy, and (2) the professor used inappropriate, insulting and hostile language against the student and there has not been a public apology.

Pitzer College's finding that the SJP students had not violated the demonstration policy nor done anything that was inappropriate because they moved each of the three times they were asked to do so.

Is there anyway to determine what actually happened? Is there a way to come to a conclusion about what is most likely to have occurred, one that isn't simply based on predilections for believing either a pro-Israel or a pro-Arab Palestinian point of view?

The different pieces of information, the veracity of those who testified or who are now talking about the incident and the bases for the differences in the findings of the two schools will be examined.  But there are many other issues that should be considered.

How did the Israeli professor become involved?  What is his background? Was he wise to intervene or, given the refusal of the pro-Israel students to speak up on his behalf after, according to him,even though he only became involved because they sought his help - that's worthy of attention.

How and why and what does it mean that a Jewish Pitzer professor has inserted himself into the incident, acting as an adviser and advocate for Hamideh.  That's worthy of attention.  Are his statements and revelations entirely trustworthy? What motivates him, how emblematic is he, who counters him on the other side?

What role did the film "5 Broken Cameras" play in this drama, and how is it playing out in other areas where it is shown?  The SJP students watched a screening of the film just a few hours after the street theater demonstration, the Jewish Pitzer professor talked quite a bit about the film's significance, at least one college student reporter was influenced by the film and its impact infiltrated the interview she conducted with Raviv, shortly after the incident.  The impact of this film on how the Arab-Israeli conflict is treated on campuses is another lens through which we will look.

To conclude this article, it is worth looking at a piece of objective evidence which puts into question one claim made by the student, and it is the basis for the allegation of racism against Prof. Raviv, something that he says has harmed him already.

Najib Hamideh claims that when Raviv called him a cockroach, that was a racial slur.  Dan Segal, an anthropology professor at Pitzer and someone who had been acting as an advocate for Hamideh, insists the term is racist, because, as he told The Jewish Press, "calling a Palestinian student a cockroach, in this racially charged atmosphere, was racist, because language takes its meaning in context."  Segal insisted that given that Raviv "is a staunch, uncritical defender of the state of Israel," his use of the word turns it into a dehumanizing and demeaning term.

But that argument only works at all if Raviv knew Hamideh was of Arab Palestinian descent.  Raviv insists he did not have any idea what Hamideh's racial heritage was.

Segal insists Raviv had to know.  Why? "Because," Segal told The Jewish Press, "the student identified as a Palestinian, he was at a pro-Palestinian event and he was wearing the scarf [keffiya].  Segal insisted, although he admitted not being present, that Hamideh was wearing a keffiya.

Raviv told The Jewish Press that Hamideh was definitely not wearing a keffiya.  How can he be so sure?

“I know he wasn’t wearing a keffiya, for sure, for two reasons.  One, the student was engaged in street theater pretending to be an IDF soldier, he was dressed as an IDF soldier, of course he was not wearing a keffiya.  The second reason is that Raviv saw Hamideh at the event, and “he was not wearing the scarf, the keffiya.”  A picture of Hamideh at the Israeli checkpoint demonstration is at the top of this article and below.

Najib Hamideh and other SJP students at Claremont McKenna College, after mock Israeli checkpoint demonstration, March 4, 2013

Najib Hamideh and other SJP students at Claremont McKenna College, after mock Israeli checkpoint demonstration, March 4, 2013

 

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

24 Responses to “Cockroach Curses and Jew Hunting in California Colleges”

  1. I would like to see one of those cockroaches attempt to stop me, they will be needing medical afterward.

  2. Kudos to Loren Griffith. The "Palestinians" are ridiculous haters of civilization, no doubt. But the Jews who care about Israel absolutely MUST, always, be willing to stand up for themselves and their people, their Torah and their country. Jews have died for those things in the past (and the present) and will no doubt continue to do so. I do not understand why fraidy-cat college students lack the courage to stand up. Their failure doesn't vindicate what the haters do, but it sure does make the hating more effective. Such Jewish students should be ashamed — and more productively, they should change their act.

    Lori Marcus is, as usual, to be congratulated for a careful piece of journalism and thoughtful analysis.

  3. Kudos to Loren Griffith. The "Palestinians" are ridiculous haters of civilization, no doubt. But the Jews who care about Israel absolutely MUST, always, be willing to stand up for themselves and their people, their Torah and their country. Jews have died for those things in the past (and the present) and will no doubt continue to do so. I do not understand why fraidy-cat college students lack the courage to stand up. Their failure doesn't vindicate what the haters do, but it sure does make the hating more effective. Such Jewish students should be ashamed — and more productively, they should change their act.

    Lori Marcus is, as usual, to be congratulated for a careful piece of journalism and thoughtful analysis.

  4. Gern Blansten says:

    Wow, you might be a real man. With a little dick…

  5. Gern Blansten says:

    F' Israel! It is filled with a bunch eastern european Khazar converts. Talk about roaches! Go back to E.Europe you zionist scum!

  6. Claire Friedman Bennett says:

    Saying, "I will hunt you down," is also a racial slur and threat to a Jewish person. So, if there are any apologies, they belong all around, including the students who blocked access to the cafeteria for the other students.

  7. Nanette CohenRayman says:

    why are the Jewish students traumatized? why don't' they finally fight back? the mockery from the anti-Israel, which means anti-Jew people needs to be fought, not run from? Would Kahane have run like a baby? Jews need to shed the victim ghetto Jew mentality NOW……or come up with their own street "theatre"…and people call each other cockroaches all the time…..this is just so childish…if someone blocked me, I would call them worse than cockroach…MAN….GROW SOME COJONES.

  8. Anonymous says:

    where is the DOJ on these despicable and unlawful harassment of Jewish students and professors on campus. where are the police? where is obama and why isn't he utilizing the bully pulpit as any American president would do? why are these "schools" being funded by our tax dollars? why haven't the administrators of these "schools" been hauled into court both personally and the college as perpetrators of hate crimes as well? this is dangerous passivity.

  9. Myriam Obadia says:

    There is a rather easy way to solve the problem. Colleges survive on students' fees and tuition: don't send your children to Colleges which foster and anti-Jewish attitude. They'll go bankrupt and the argument will become moot.

  10. Ahava Chai says:

    The truth must come out and Liars should be punished. Why would they be pretending to be IDF Soldiers in the first place? And they betrayed themselves, they revealed their identity unwittingly by their own words.

  11. Omar Kaniel says:

    Segal's strange logic that cockroach is racist because it was uttered by a Jew is ridiculous. What if the professor called Najib a gazelle, is that also racist? It is time to acknowledge the fact that Arabs are Caucasian.

  12. Jamie Williams says:

    This seems just as stupid as the " Wear a hajib day" at Mt San Antonio College…

  13. Daniel Jennings says:

    If I were a student there and was hungry trying to get some food those kids would be in some serious trouble. I also think the professor was trying to do the right thing for the other students. If he was not he would have called a student like me to intervene and take them out. Since I could care less about jews and palestinians, messing with me would have been a mistake. I would have pushed one of them threw a window. Then I would have shown the rest playing army as an adult is wrong by kicking the **** out of them. Fudge those stupid kids who have no clue what is going on in that part of the world.

  14. Cody Flecker says:

    Why are you dressed as a Sergeant in the Union Army? As a descendent of the fighting men and woman of the Confederacy, I am deeply insulted. It was Lincoln who ordered the Jews out of the Tennessee Valley in 1863, simply because they were Jews and he feared them. That was the first and last time members of a religious group were forcibly evacuated. Shame on you.

  15. Barak Thunder says:

    Approach all anti-Israel "demonstrations with a video capera (preferrably hidden. There are many miniature models a la James Bond now available) and video the confrontation. Work it so that the "demonstrators" land the first blow, even just a push or shove, and then prosecute them to kingdom come.

  16. Gil Gilman says:

    Loren, I don't understand why calling any one a cockroach is derogatory. For one thing they are one of the hardiest creatures on the planet. They can survive atomic radiation, even roach motels. Now they are being use to develop anti-toxins to fight against bacteria and virus that do not respond to antibiotics. Not only that, but if your bathtub and drain are exceptionally clean without your purview, you definitely have cockroaches. So it sounds like he erroneously complimented the student. The one thing that is guaranteed to rid the planet of the pests is a persistent noise of the right frequency emitted from a speaker. I am not lying to you ;-)

  17. Daniel Segal says:

    Omar Kaniel is correct to speak critically of "Segal's strange logic," since the quotations and reasoning presented as mine in the article are strange, muddled, and unconvincing. In fact, I am Daniel Segal, and I am not persuaded by the "strange logic" pushed into my mouth by the article.

    It took a lot of creative dishonesty on the part of the journalist to put such words into my mouth.

    What I have said–and what other journalists have managed to report with much accuracy–is that to call someone a "****ing cockroach" (as Professor Raviv did, when speaking to SJP students) is to adopt a metaphor that figures the addressee as less than human and as an undesirable breed–and specifically, as a breed that "we humans" typically seek to kill. Such a verbal attack is thus dehumanizing and racializing.

    Allow me to add, here, in response to Omar Kaniel's comment that "Arabs are Caucasion," that the scientific consensus (as stated clearly in the statement on race by the American Anthropological Association) is that there are no objectively existing racial groups within the human species. All such racial classifications are constructs. "Races" exist as groupings that have been made up by humans through historical processes–so they exist in the same way that sports teams exist. Those too are made up, or socially constructed, groups. From this perspective, of the modern scientific consensus on race, saying that Arabs are or are not Caucasian — whichever claim is made — does not make sense. A racial identification is a fact about what is made about a person, not a fact about what a person "is," in an objective sense.

  18. Daniel Segal says:

    Omar Kaniel is correct to speak critically of "Segal's strange logic," since the quotations and reasoning presented as mine in the article are strange, muddled, and unconvincing. In fact, I am Daniel Segal, and I am not persuaded by the "strange logic" pushed into my mouth by the article.

    It took a lot of creative dishonesty on the part of the journalist to put such words into my mouth.

    What I have said–and what other journalists have managed to report with much accuracy–is that to call someone a "****ing cockroach" (as Professor Raviv did, when speaking to SJP students) is to adopt a metaphor that figures the addressee as less than human and as an undesirable breed–and specifically, as a breed that "we humans" typically seek to kill. Such a verbal attack is thus dehumanizing and racializing.

    Allow me to add, here, in response to Omar Kaniel's comment that "Arabs are Caucasion," that the scientific consensus (as stated clearly in the statement on race by the American Anthropological Association) is that there are no objectively existing racial groups within the human species. All such racial classifications are constructs. "Races" exist as groupings that have been made up by humans through historical processes–so they exist in the same way that sports teams exist. Those too are made up, or socially constructed, groups. From this perspective, of the modern scientific consensus on race, saying that Arabs are or are not Caucasian — whichever claim is made — does not make sense. A racial identification is a fact about what is made about a person, not a fact about what a person "is," in an objective sense.

  19. Daniel Segal says:

    To call someone a "****ing cockroach" (as Professor Raviv did, when speaking to SJP students) is to adopt a metaphor that figures the addressee as less than human and as an undesirable breed–and specifically, as a breed that "we humans" typically seek to kill. Such a verbal attack is thus dehumanizing and racializing.

  20. Daniel Segal says:

    Omar Kaniel is correct to speak critically of "Segal's strange logic," since the quotations and reasoning presented as mine in the article are strange, muddled, and unconvincing. In fact, I am Daniel Segal, and I am not persuaded by the "strange logic" pushed into my mouth by the article.

    It took a lot of creativity on the part of the journalist to put such words into my mouth.

    What I have said–and what other journalists have managed to report with much accuracy–is that to call someone a "****ing cockroach" (as Professor Raviv did, when speaking to SJP students) is to adopt a metaphor that figures the addressee as less than human and as an undesirable breed–and specifically, as a breed that "we humans" typically seek to kill. Such a verbal attack is thus dehumanizing and racializing.

    Allow me to add, here, …in response to Omar Kaniel's comment that "Arabs are Caucasion," that the scientific consensus (as stated clearly in the statement on race by the American Anthropological Association) is that there are no objectively existing racial groups within the human species. All such racial classifications are constructs. "Races" exist as groupings that have been made up by humans through historical processes–so they exist in the same way that sports teams exist. Those too are made up, or socially constructed, groups. From this perspective, of the modern scientific consensus on race, saying that Arabs are or are not Caucasian — whichever claim is made — does not make sense. A racial identification is a fact about what is made about a person, not a fact about what a person "is," in an objective sense.

  21. Daniel Segal says:

    The simulated SJP checkpoint at CMC on March 4–like Martin Luther King's work against white racism–involved direct, non-violent action. Professor Raviv himself reported that he refused to participate in the simulation and yet passed through the door into the dining hall "without physical contact." In fact, no one was stopped, blocked, or kept from using the door as a way into the dining hall. No one.

    I note that in contrast to the non-violent protest of the SJP students, Mr. Griffith threatens violence. On this point, I am with Martin Luther King in believing that non-violencer protest is the way all of us should pursue causes we believe in. I must condemn Mr. Griffith's threats of violence, exactly as I would if (hypothetically) there were threats of violence from student activists for Palestinian rights. Non-violence is the way to go.

  22. Daniel Segal says:

    Myriam–a question for you: do you recognize the distinction between criticisms of Israeli state's poliices and anti-Jewish attitudes? I am a Jew and a proud Jew, and as a Jew and a humanitarian, I object to the Israeli state's policies in regard to Palestine and in regard to its own non-Jewish citizens. But my tough-minded criticisms of the Israeli state are not anti-Jewish.

    If you want to identify anti-Jewish attitudes, think about the Saudi state–which denies entry to us as Jews. Why is it that so few US Zionists speak out against US support for Saudi Arabia? The support of Saudi Arabia by the US govenrment is anti-Jewish and should be condemned.

    By contrast, at SJP events at the Claremont Colleges, I have never once heard an anti-Jewish statement, and I have heard SJP students pro-actively state that they are critics of Israel, but not critics of Jews and Judaism.

  23. Daniel Segal says:

    Claire, there is no corroboration for Professor Raviv's claim that any SJP student said to him, "I will hunt you down" or words to that effect. In fact, the campus security officer was present at the interaction and the officer's report does tell us that the officer heard Professor Raviv attack the SJP student, by saying "**** you" and calling the student a "cockroach." But the campus security officer's report has no corroboration of the Professor's claim he was threatened–and no other witness has corroborated the claim. The sole source for that claim is Professor Raviv.

  24. You are absolutely right.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Sen. Ted Cruz acts senate for unanimous consent to pass the Expatriate Terrorist Act. Sept. 18, 2014.
Ds Reject Voting to Strip Citizenship From US Jihadi ISIS Volunteers
Latest News Stories

Terrorists from Shuafat Refugee Camp opened fire at a home in Pisgat Ze’ev…

Iron Dome Missile Defense System protecting parts of southern Israel.

Defense official do not believe Hamas will actually begin shooting rockets at Israel over the next week or two.

Sen. Ted Cruz acts senate for unanimous consent to pass the Expatriate Terrorist Act. Sept. 18, 2014.

Cruz sought but failed to obtain senate’s unanimous consent to pass Expatriate Terrorist Act of 2014.

Terror tunnel work accident leaves 1 terrorist dead.

The world’s oldest known Jewish prayer book, or siddur, was displayed for the first time to the general public at the Bible Lands Museum.

The cabinet is set to vote on the path of the security fence which would cut off Gush Etzion from Jerusalem as well as be a major eyesore.

UK Muslims are calling on ISIS to release British aid volunteer Alan Henning, whose life is now threatened by the group.

Border Police officers blocked an axe-toting Arab man from carrying out a terror attack near Jerusalem.

A Code Red incoming rocket alert was sounded for Gaza Belt and Ashkelon Coastal communities.

Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz says former Pres. Bill Clinton is wrong about PM Netanyahu.

A massive sting operation hauled in 15 suspects and foiled a plot by ISIS to hold a public beheading in Australia.

A 3-hour strike at Ben Gurion International Airport at check-in counters has delayed thousands.

Have you seen Menachem Bodner’s twin brother Jeno, or Jolli Gottesman? He’s out there.

Iran scorns as “ridiculous” a US-led anti-ISIS coalition without boots on the ground.

A prison inmate on death row in Connecticut is demanding kosher food, though he’s not really Jewish.

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Sen. Ted Cruz acts senate for unanimous consent to pass the Expatriate Terrorist Act. Sept. 18, 2014.

Cruz sought but failed to obtain senate’s unanimous consent to pass Expatriate Terrorist Act of 2014.

British sports store fired security guard who barred Jewish kids from entering the store.

Arameans are now recognized as a distinct nationality in Israel.

Naftali Frenkel’s mother’s message for Rosh HaShana is for the Jewish people to remain united, as one family.

ISIS released a slick trailer warning Obama that the “Flames of War” are “coming soon.”

There were reports that ISIS shot down a Syrian regime’s war plane over its “capital,” Raqqa.

The Met’s upcoming opera trivializes the murder of Jews, pretends Jews have no connection to Israel, and portrays terrorists as victims.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/cockroach-curses-and-jew-hunting-in-california-colleges/2013/05/10/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: