Photo Credit: Khamenei.ir
Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Hosseini Khamenei

The Iranian government is now demanding the finished nuclear deal be re-opened for negotiation, again.

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei demanded earlier this month that sanctions be lifted entirely, rather than simply suspended as agreed in the nuclear deal signed in July.

Advertisement

This past weekend, the demand was repeated by a top Iranian official ahead of the upcoming United Nations General Assembly, where informal negotiations often take place on the sidelines. On September 28, Iranian officials plan to meet with the entire P5+1 delegation that negotiated the nuclear deal with Iran, according to Iran’s FARS news agency.

However, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry reportedly plans to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif in the coming days in New York over the issue. According to Fox News, a State Department official said there will be no further negotiation.

“We’ve long said that we’re not going to comment on or react to every statement attributed to the Iranian leadership,” the official told FoxNews.com. “Our focus is on implementing the deal, and verifying that Iran completes its key nuclear steps under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). There is no renegotiation, and the nuclear-related sanctions relief that Iran will receive once the IAEA verifies that it has completed its nuclear steps is clearly spelled out in the text of the [agreement].”

The ayatollah has said, however, that unless sanctions are lifted entirely, “there will be no deal.” According to a translation by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), Khamenei warned if sanctions are only suspended, Iran too will only “suspend” the nuclear activities listed in the agreement.

In the text of the agreement, there is a reference to “lifting” the sanctions, but the White House has promised that sanctions “will snap back into place” if Iran violates its end of the deal.

According to MEMRI, it’s not that simple. The talks on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly may provide a forum for new negotiations over further concessions to Iran. Outright “lifting of sanctions” would constitute a “fundamental change” to the deal, MEMRI pointed out, because “lifting the sanctions, rather than suspending them, will render impossible a ‘snapback’ in case of Iranian violations.”

Three Iran leaders announced already last July, however, that Iran intended to openly violate at least part of United Nations Security Council Resolution 2231.

“Just as we refrained from complying with UN Security Council resolutions, we can do so with regard to 2231,” explained senior negotiator Abbas Araghchi in an interview on Iranian Channel 2 broadcast on July 20, 2015, picked up and translated by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).

The three leaders, President Hassan Rouhani, Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, and Araghchi, who also serves as deputy foreign minister, emphasized in the interview that Iran has no intention of abiding by the UN resolution, which includes both the JCPOA and Annex B – the list of points with which Iran disagrees, including the issue of sanctions on the Iranian missile development project. Rather, Iran seeks to abide only by the JCPOA.

Following the passage of UNSCR 2231, the Iranian foreign ministry issued a statement noting, “Iran does not attach legitimacy to any restriction and any threat. If UNSCR 2231 will be violated by Iran, it will be a violation of the Security Council resolution and not of the JCPOA, similar to what happened 10 years ago when we violated Security Council resolutions and nothing happened.

“The text of the JCPOA notes the fact that the content of the JCPOA and of the UN Security Council resolution are two separate things,” the statement read.

During the interview, Araghchi said that there had been tough bargaining between the Iranian and American delegations over the issue of the arms embargo on Iran and the sanctions related to Iran’s missile development project.

Advertisement

1
2
SHARE
Previous articleThe Iran Deal: Bad For America And Israel
Next articleTerrorist Indicted in Attack on Jaffa Yeshiva
Hana Levi Julian is a Middle East news analyst with a degree in Mass Communication and Journalism from Southern Connecticut State University. A past columnist with The Jewish Press and senior editor at Arutz 7, Ms. Julian has written for Babble.com, Chabad.org and other media outlets, in addition to her years working in broadcast journalism.

30 COMMENTS

  1. GOOD NEWS!! IF THINGS ARE RE-OPENED THE U S SHOULD ASK IRAN IN EXCHANGE FOR ALL SANCTIONS LIFTED IMMEDIATELY….1) RELEASE ALL AMERICAN AND FOREIGN HOSTAGES OR ANY ONE ELSE IRAN HAS IMPRISONED FOR POLITICAL CRIMES..2) RECOGNIZE ISRAEL AND STOP THE THREATS 3) GUARANTEE FREE ELECTIONS WHEN DUE …4) CEASE MEDDLING IN THE MIDDLE EAST…CONTROL HEZBOLLAH AND HAMAS
    AND KEEP THEM WHERE THEY ARE
    I'M DREAMING!!

  2. I agree with Herman Rosen, that since Iran states that they will not comply with the terms of the deal that was signed, unless new terms are included namely lifting of all sanctions, that constitutes anticipatory breach of contract. The deal is dead, legally. Either Iran agrees to a new set of conditions, which should require that it immediately cease sponsoring terrorist group such as Hamas and Hezbollah, and recognize Israel as a Jewish state, stop threatening it with extinction, stop threats against the US. Any breach of those terms will constitute breach of the agreement.

    The fact is, that Iran has no intention of honoring any of its committments. I do not fathom how the US could sign a deal with Iran without insisting that American hostages be released as a precondition of negotiating. Iran sees the US as a stupid pushover. Obama has disgraced America in the eyes of the world.

  3. The truth is that the Iranians don't have to demand any more concessions… they can do whatever they want as they alone will monitor their own progress. What is being done here by a public demand for more concessions is a face-shaming and humiliation of the US president and America, to show the world that Obama has no guts and no control over this "deal"… whatever it is. It is pure theater.

  4. Very scary the Iranian's could very very easily have a nuclear Bomb within a year or less, it's to great a risk for Israel they must use nuclear weapon's & annihilate all of Iran, if not it WILL BE THE END OF iSRAEL, NEVER FORGET THOSE WORD'S iSRAEL'S SECURITY IS NONEGOTIABLE!!!!

  5. Outward declaration of non compliance. This should be a warning not forgotten. Israel must attack iranian facilities again as soon as they know they are producing. Its called pre emtive strike and the legality of the strike is in the declaration of non compliance.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...